Hmmm. That could fit. He certainly hasn’t been much of a generator lately, at least as far as enthusiasm goes.
Maybe he has a busted armature.
Hmmm. That could fit. He certainly hasn’t been much of a generator lately, at least as far as enthusiasm goes.
Maybe he has a busted armature.
And of course he sold the corporate naming rights to the box- to Pandora.
They’re just pissy that the Reagan hologram didn’t work out. (Probably afraid that even zombie Reagan couldn’t stomach the spew they wanted to program it to say)
Thank you. I must say, I was not impressed, as I did not collapse weeping. Usually a single still of John, Robert, or Edward can do that.
So, what has got everyone’s knickers in a twist? The implication the Barack Obama is not the natural enemy of every rich white man in the U.S.?
You know, you have to give Romney credit, he was debating the well beloved last surviving scion of a family of probably the most persuasive public speakers since Cicero. He went to that podium knowing he was going to get trounced **and **lose the election, and just doing that showed more generative organs than he is commonly thought to possess.
(and all the rest above… )
How do you know that I wasn’t subconsciously referring to this armature:
From the link, bolding mine:
Now that’s just a sad, sad statement.
I remember the part where Bush and Quayle won, and Dukakis and Bentsen lost. I’m going to guess that’s the thing that’s most remembered about the 1988 election.
Sure, in a relative “oh yeah, that too” sort of way. But this is a hijack.
[shrug] So, he was mistaken. So what? No harm, no foul. How is that “treasonous” anyway?
I need to refrain from rancid.
Sorry. My mistake. It is not a Democrat or a Democratic Party. It is a Communist Party!
Obvious _____ is obvious.
Dude, without scurrying over to wikipedia, can you even explain the difference between dialectical materialism, Jeffersonian democracy, and Keynesian economics?
Beyond that, I sincerely doubt you give two shits about any of the people who died in various gulags throughout the world, but claiming the modern Democratic party is “a Communist Party” is incredibly disrespectful to them and the atrocities they suffered.
That said, I sincerely doubt you feel any shame for your insulting of them, the atrocities they suffered or the massive ignorance you’ve displayed, or for that matter, my own criticism of you, but for your sake, I hope one day you’ll look back on the comments you made and the way you just pissed on the graves of tens of millions of people and feel some shame.
La honte seulement doit avoir aucune
What about calling the Republican party fascists?
:dubious:
:rolleyes:
Is there really any significant difference between the Communist Party USA and the Democratic Party?
They both support redistribution of wealth, abortion, unions, class warfare, censorship of the media, cutting military spending, government spending projects, social programs, government education, affirmative action, universal healthcare, government regulation of the economy, unemployment insurance and minimum wage.
:dubious:
:rolleyes:
Here’s the Democratic Party’s platform for 2012.
Please indicate the sections that advocate “redistribution of wealth”, “class warfare”, “cutting military spending”, “affirmative action”, and “censorship of the media”.
They want higher taxes on the rich, which is redistribution of wealth and class warfare.
They want to cut defense spending.
It is not in their 2012 platform, but they have always supported affirmative action in the past and they want to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine, which is censorship of the media.