Oh sure, just as long as he can make stuff up and say it is what I think. If he actually tries to deal with what I say, its a different story alltogether.
I see you freely use the “homophobe” card too. I was expecting that. In case you weren’t aware, “phobe” signifies fear, which is a far cry from my feelings.
Perhaps you can help me understand what makes me a “homophobe”; is it my pointing out that there is a homosexual agenda that is seeking federal funds to brainwash the masses? Or is it my suggestion that he is a member of NAMBLA? Perhaps you noted that I pointed out that I was using these conjectures to point out how his claims of what I believe in were created by him, so I was free to do the same. Or can you guys not read past the first sentence before you form your reply.
Before I let you know why I am not in fact anti-gay, I think i’ll just sit back and laugh at “ask the gay guy” get himself all worked into a lather. But please, in the future do not refer to my “massive hard on” again, hearing that from the likes of you makes me uncomfortable…
That’s, of course, theoretical meaning, “I can make up whatever unrealistic situation I want and when you point out anything that it wrong, I will just change the rules.”
You are a silly little man living in a fantasy world. If you don’t want a visit from the taxman when you own property in the USA, fine. Move the fuck away. You obviously have no desire to take advantage of any benefits afforded to citizens, so why don’t you find another country where you can build your “hypothetical” utopia.
Hopefully you can find someplace where they haven’t yet put the gay brainwashing machine to work.
Ah, yes, a “simple little man” (though with a massive hardon, according to Esprix’s vision of me) who simply wants a government that resembles that which is provided for in the Constitution. A crazy notion, perhaps? All I want is a Federal Govt that restricts its activities to those that are explicitly granted to it by the people through the Constitution. All other rights, which are not explicitly granted to it, nor denied to it, are reserved to the States, or the people. What is so complicated about that?
You guys are so funny. You are an endless source of amusement. Just poke a stick in the cage, and the animals react accordingly.
baliner! Ix-nay on the ay-gay ainwashing machine-bay!
hudley, that was enjoyable, watching you dig a hole for yourself. Did the tax-supported public education school you went to teach you that, or did you learn that all by yourself?
Theoretically, I’m pointing out to you that your theoretical situation is entirely possible - become Amish. Or move onto a Native American reservation. Perhaps start a little plot of land you can call your own at the British embassy, which is considered foreign soil. Even just becoming a farmer (or a cult leader in Waco, perhaps) would seem to satisfy most of the demands of your hypothetical posit - exchange goods and services for rent on someone else’s land, and you’d never have to pay taxes again. All I’m asking is, if it sounds like such a good idea to you, why don’t you do it? It’s entirely possible, plausible and many before you have done it.
Now if you’ll excuse me I have to go rape some little boys, influence the media, fellate Congress for some new legislation, and whittle away at the infrastructure of American society. Such a busy day!
Sorry, I’m far to busy oppressing minorities, burning homeless shelters, and writing a sequel to the Turner Diaries to spend much time watching tv.
And Esprix, while I enjoyed the humor in your post, I laugh at your suggestion that I “dug a hole for myself”. Your interpretation of my statement (actually, just an aside to my original statement) does not constitute a “hole” because I choose not to defend a point of view that you created. You have posited that I advocate living outside the system, when all I did was merely state that such a condition is nigh on impossible outside of religeous grounds) and you have repeatedly ignored my statements that some taxes are just and needed. If DocCathode can re-read my post and grasp my original intent, what is preventing you? I suspect it is that you do not want to deal with my position rationally but rather emotionally, and the easiest way to do that is through the usual means of the left.
And I and others have already pointed out that, indeed, it is possible, albeit not easily. And, in the end, even if you generated no actual cash income and paid no taxes, there are still going to be government-paid things you will use.
And forcibly interjecting your lunatic homophobia into a completely unrelated thread is the hole of which I speak. Your rabid responses to answers to your own hypothetical question is a different hole altogether. Both speak volumes of your intellect (which, ironically enough, could also be looked at as a hole - a black hole, specifically).
And is it just me, or does anyone else see our favorite television programs being interrupted in a couple of years by a news bulletin about an FBI stand-off in a remote mountain region with hudley and a crazed band of highly armed followers and/or family members? (Hang in there, chief - Aryans around the world are rootin’ for ya!)