Did we change the constitution and I missed it? also unless I’m wrong theres not even been pure English since the 4 or 500s? and it was a personal convo anyways
and besides there in joisy the hell do they know bout English anyways ?
so id of walked out my self using every swear word in any language I remember …
Well, me for one is sick to tired of all dose immogrunts and dare funny talking. This America, and Mericans oughta talk like day are one. Dis is a yuuuge problem and we is gonna address it bigly!
I was working on a large project in China once. In order of number of native speakers we had; Chinese, German, Finnish, Swedish, and Americans. According to the project manager the official project language was bad English, because everybody spoke bad English, especially the Americans.
If you’re the kind of person who gets upset when somebody else is speaking another language in “your” country, then it’s not enough for you to “defend” the English language. You have to tell them to speak American.
I was following along, albeit with difficulty, until “id of”, which one can only assume should HAVE been “I’d of”. Whenever I see that, it is like a hot poker to the eyeballs, and I immediately shut down.
In all fairness, there isn’t really a recognised way of writing the contraction for “I would have”. “I’d’ve” looks funny, though is closest to what we actually say?
I’d’ve is, indeed the version I use (and the correct one). I wouldn’t say it’s closest to what we actually say; it is what we actually say, though many people misspell it as “I’d of” because “I’d’ve” and “I’d of” are homophonic, and the double contraction trips people up.
The OP has form throughout his posts of completely disregarding ANY standards of orthography though. He is the worst long-term poster on these boards for this.
You do realize, of course, that “of” is not a goddamn verb? It’s a preposition. I would of makes no sense whatsoever, in any language. Please explain to me what action you think the word “of” describes. Take your time. I’ll wait.