Seems to me like the administration is missing out on a great opportunity to use this student’s fluency in peer teaching.
What a stupid, stupid rule.
The administrator should be assigned to a position far away from children and decision-making. Put her in charge of securing a light bulb for the overhead projector. That will keep her busy for a full year.
It was a stupid reason to suspend a kid, especially without a written policy and a good reason behind it. But I found the kid’s speech amusing, with the use of “like,” “totally” and “whatever.”
One of the joys of the Pit is how anything, no matter how stupid, will be defended by somebody here. My bet is Clothahump will be our brave knight in this thread.
My daughter speaks Chinese in adition to English. Maybe I should get a lawyer on retainer now just in case she slips up and accidentally says shi-shi instead of thank you. Fucktards.
Well, I’m not Clothahump, and I’m not really even defending this…it’s indefensible. I did, however, want to point out that this is an alternative HS in Kansas. I don’t know what ‘alternative’ means in this case, but the alternative high schools I used to teach in were little more than holding pens for the kids who had been kicked out of regular schools for behavior/drug/crime issues. Their unwritten rule against students conversing with one another in languages other than English was likely the reaction of an underdeveloped faculty without basic Spanish comprehension trying to keep the facility safe and drug-free.
I came in here to post much the same thing. It was a stupid, indefensible suspension, but Farmwoman’s absolutely right about why they likely had such an “unwritten” policy.
I (back in my delinquent days) went to an Alternative public high school, and it’s pretty much exactly the way she describes it. We only had about 200 kids in the entire school, and it still wasn’t out of the norm for a police car to be called to the school at least 3-4 times a week, almost always resulting in an arrest.
I’d bet good money that’s the exact reason for the policy. It was likely judged a good way to help keep trouble down within the school. It makes it harder for a teacher to figure out who’s about to cause an issue in the classroom if she can’t understand what they’re saying.
Interestingly enough though., my husband works in a prison and they are not even allowed to forbid inmates from speaking other languages, especially ones like Spanish. Cypher and other things like that are forbidden, but it would be absurd to say they could not speak in a native tongue. It would be like admitting, “well, we are too uneducated and untrained to understand you, so you can’t do it”.
Well…yeah, that’s why this is ridiculous and indefensible. Being stupid and indefensible doesn’t stop it from being a reason for the unwritten policy, though.
You are probably right in your reasoning. Time for those teachers to pick up basic Spanish when they return to school for professional development and certification renewal. (Hey, I was a teacher; this is a fair suggestion.)
Absolutely, old boy! When I see what you chaps have done to the language of Shakespeare…I also assume, as this is a school in Kansas, that I can’t say the English language has evolved :eek:
By the way I’m English, not British.
And from the original article:
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) made that point this summer when he vetoed a bill authorizing various academic subjects to be tested in Spanish in the state’s public schools. “As an immigrant,” the Austrian-born governor said, “I know the importance of mastering English as quickly and as comprehensively as possible.”
When is he going to lose his Austrian accent then?