Many extremely intelligent posters knowledgeable about the subject matter you have posted on have read your posts and come to the conclusion that you are ignorant. In fact, the main thing you have demonstrated here is that you are too ignorant to even understand the depths of your own ignorance. That, and that you have the social skills of a five-year-old.
You’re going to have to attack his “science”. His computational “knowledge”. His “physics”. DiVinyls won’t do it. 
Maybe Sam Cooke?
When I pit you, ignore me.
When I pit myself, ignore me harder.
Dammit. You’re right.
SamuelA, I apologize. That was unfair of me. I come across as trying too hard sometimes, especially when I’m excited about something. I appreciate your slowing my roll, and you’re right–we should take things slow.
You’re arrogant and ignorant. Can we at least start there?
What up, mang?
I honestly think his ignore list is a post-it stuck to his monitor, right below the yellowed password list from 2013.
Holy crap, while doing an unrelated search I found SamuelA’s ignore filter!
A guy walks into a barber shop, asks "Bob Peters here? " barber replies "Nope. Just cut hair.
Social skills don’t matter, facts do. Those posters were wrong and I showed them. Posters who blithely dismiss signal processing theory, for example. Or posters who admit I was right about nuclear chain of command, and then just say they don’t care. You know, those guys.
The fact that you can’t tell who’s correct means you lack the ability to differentiate. I mean, you did read the posts in question, right? You didn’t just jump to your conclusion that I have to be the ignorant one based on a hunch, right? You did properly research it, didn’t you…
I see no effort that you have. Just “oh you’re all wrong, I haven’t actually read your posts or if I did, I went by tone and not content”. That’s what I am hearing, which is why I’d add you to ignore if I could, because you deserve it.
Reality doesn’t care if you made the right primate signals. Reality uses laws, and those laws are the same independent of observer.
So you’ve reached this conclusion based on…? If you supported it, I’d pay attention. If you just blithely declared this without a reason, I’m going to conclude it means “ooga booga other primates are against this primate, thus I’m gonna throw rocks too”. Which would be ignore worthy behavior.
Your ignorance and your arrogance.
SamuelA
This message is hidden because SamuelA is on your ignore list.
SamuelA
This message is hidden because SamuelA is on your ignore list.
SamuelA
This message is hidden because SamuelA is on your ignore list.
SamuelA
This message is hidden because SamuelA is on your ignore list.
SamuelA
This message is hidden because SamuelA is on your ignore list.
SamuelA
This message is hidden because SamuelA is on your ignore list.
SamuelA
This message is hidden because SamuelA is on your ignore list.
That’s what this thread looks like with fuckferret on your ignore list.
“Social skills don’t matter”
LOL. That is literally the most incorrect thing you said in this thread, Sams. And that is impressive.
Your posts.
You’re a liar and it’s embarrassing that someone trusts you enough to moderate this message board.
You willfully failed to read the next 3 paragraphs, which establish conditionally *when *social skills don’t matter. You’ve tripped my threshold for ignore.
Yes! Take that, Troutman! 
Welcome to the club! Tripler had the goat, last I saw.
Well, he is a real bird brain.
The goat fled inland early this morning. All we have now is a marmoset and an echidna with some sort of sneezing disorder.