Could be worse. He could be accusing Cruz of liking k. d. lang (who is from Alberta as well).
No, the important thing to remember is that it’s legal. The Clinton Doctrine states that anything not expressly illegal is not a scandal.
What’s legal is important to remember. So I think all the calls to arrest Cruz should stop right now. However, a guy who likes to bash government overreaching can rightly be called a dick when he pulls a Big Brother scare scam on voters. No?
Interesting if true. ::snort:: Hey, it’s an improvement over the Nixon Doctrine: “The President is above the law.”
Cite: My posterior.
Why would that be worse?
Oh man, Nixon actually said something like that. “…when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.”
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2007/05/19/13066/nixon-bush-illegal/
k.d. lang is homosexual. Latest news says Cruz don’t like 'em.
How To Lose Friends and Alienate People - Ted Cruz, Way!
Here’s what really irks me about that.
The smart meter data is fact-based. OTOH, saying “Most guests reuse their towels; you should too.” is simply fact-free advertising. They could put up those signs when not 1 in 1000 guests actually re-use towels.
Applying this to politics is going ever deeper into an area where not only are facts rare, but we’re ever more accepting of the idea that there are no facts at all, and that that’s 100% OK.
Is there any evidence the Cruz mailings were actually factual about the neighbors’ voting records, or did they just make up those facts too?
They are made up, which strangely makes them simultaneously more dishonest yet less creepily privacy-invading.
And there’s the denunciation by the Iowa Secretary of State in the Des Moines Register. If I were advising the Rubio campaign, I would move hell and high water to get some sweet old ladies to freak out, calling their kids and grandkids in a panic about their “violation”, and get the attention of Des Moines Register reporters in time to get into the Monday paper.
Robert Reich now shows in my Facebook Newsfeed (I must have clicked Like at the wrong time). I’ll Unfollow him soon, but might as well report his recent comment about Mr Cruz.
[QUOTE=Robert Reich]
It’s important to differentiate two different kinds of anti-government conservative: those who want a smaller government, and those who want to destroy government. The first are principled conservatives. The second are dangerous traitors to the system of governance America depends on.
Ted Cruz is in the second category. Yesterday, Iowa’s secretary of state criticized the Cruz campaign for sending out a mailer to potential Cruz voters disguised as an official document, suggesting they had a legal obligation to show up at Monday’s caucuses. Cruz was unapologetic.
Just as he precipitated the federal government shutdown several years ago, urged House members to go off the “fiscal cliff,” and created such havoc in the Senate that all of his Republican colleagues oppose his candidacy, Cruz’s willingness to undermine our governing system in pursuit of his own goals is unbounded.
Ted Cruz is not a small-government conservative. He is an unprincipled wrecking-ball.
What do you think?
[/QUOTE]
That would be very cool.
Too bad they couldn’t harness his ego.
Hey, just wanted to pull it out of the mud, not fling it into orbit!
That’s the orbit of Neptune, by the way.
Another GOP campaign did broadly the same thing in 2014, but I can’t remember who.
Despite that scummy tactic, looks like Cruz won Iowa: http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/01/politics/iowa-caucuses-republican-speeches/index.html
Just a bit over a week ago Ted Cruz was quoted as saying, “I’m not going into the mud …”
Republican Party of Iowa.