But I would like to do something with a fill-in issue until we’re ready to start any serious literary work again. I think I’d like to put together a “greatest hits” type of issue. We’ve put out 14 issues so far, plus the assortment of posts that we’ve culled for the “Extras.” I’d like to know what pieces are your favorites and why. This will allow us to do two things : first, it will show the authors what you liked and why. Secondly, it will prove to us that it’s really being read and appreciated and give us the will to live.
So, if something in either “Teemings”, “Teemings Extras”, or the special edition we did “In the Wake of the Fire” has touched you, make you think, made you laugh, made you cry, made you feel, drop me a line. tell me what article and why it impressed you so much. We’ll try to compile them all for a fill in issue come the end of January.
My nominated favorite shall be dispatched forthwith. Then I’ll have to re-read and pick out a couple more. We’ve had some great stuff written by some clever and talented folkses.
And I was serious in the other thread - if there’s anything I can do to help with Teemings…
Oh, please. All logic is ultimately based on our observations of the physical world. Logic is therefore determined by science. If something is logically consistent, but disproved in the lab, it is invalid. Either the god predicted by the OP (Ont. proof, not original post) is observable, or it isn’t. If it isn’t observable, then it has no effect on reality. If it is observable, then we should have some experimental proof. We don’t. Therefore, the ontological argument is bogus.
And I think Maid Marian in the animated Robin Hood was hot.
