Today on MSN.com, direct quote:
OK. So the visual exploitation of young women is bad, right?
(Yes, I see the differences. But somehow…! No, never mind, I’m crazy. :rolleyes: )
Sounds sorta’ like it might be one of Nostradamas’ lesser know nocturns.
From that first link, something really upset me:
"The first, scheduled to go to trial on July 22, involves a “mom and pop” site run by an Arkansas couple that featured their 12-year-old daughter.
Sheriff’s deputies officers who served a search warrant on the home of James and Donna Cummings of Magazine, Ark., in October 2001 found a videotape featuring the daughter that a prosecutor described as “significantly more explicit” than the cheesecake-style photos of her that were posted on the site.
The Cummingses, who are free on bail, are charged with the state felony of “engaging children in sexually explicit conduct for use in visual or print medium,” and face a maximum of 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine. In the meantime, the couple’s four children have temporarily been placed in the custody of a grandparent pending the outcome of the trial. "
I don’t know whether to be sad or angry. I guess I’ll just settle for ‘disgusted’