We are linking to your posts. We are not misquoting you when we are linking to your word-for-word posts. Misquoting would be posting words you never posted. Since we are linking to your posts, without changing the posts, we are not misquoting you. Nor are we misleading - we are linking to your own posts, without changing them, and then discussing the implications of those posts. We are also not falsely accusing you - we are linking to your own posts, without changing those posts, and then discussing the (rather obvious) implications of those posts.
You said this:
It certainly is true that you do not come out and say, in this post, that George allowed Caylee to drown. But you STRONGLY implied it.
In addition, here is the quote that Leaffan took word for word from another post by you:
The implication of that post is that you believe that Caylee drowned, George found her, and since Caylee was in George’s care at the time, George’s negligence allowed Caylee to drown.
One does not have to spell out an accusation in so many words to clearly communicate the accusation.
I’m using the words correctly.
I am pointing out that your statements earlier in this thread contradict many statements that you’ve made elsewhere about this same topic. By posting opinions on a public message board, you’ve tacitly consented to participate in a discussion not only of the topic but also of your opinions regarding that topic. That is actually the purpose of a public message board. You don’t get to dictate the course that a discussion takes.
You have implied, strongly, in numerous posts, that you believe Caylee drowned under George’s care. Such as in this post:
If this is not an implication your part that George’s negligence allowed Caylee to drown while under his care and that he then attempted to cover up this death, I don’t know what is.
ONCE AGAIN, please list the ACTUAL EVIDENCE implicating George in the death of Caylee.