The Case of the Missing Penis

DependsSkyBum can you do more than just" poke poke jab jab…god damn that was great!"? :smiley:

Honestly, this is another reason I look at my family in horror when they get on their soapbox about medical treatment. Not to say I don’t believe in it … I just have reservations.

Okay, okay I AM paranoid!

Isabelle not just in Florida, but Texas , too. But it is not a total cap…it’s a cap on non-economic damages such as mental anguis and pain and suffering…but in this guy’s case I think he’s showing that sometimes those caps are bullshit…he will have some econmic damage but not much…the loss of a penis is all tied up in the non-economic damage aspect of it…

But he probably signed a consent form that allowed for removal of tissue if found necessary during the original surgery.

<sigh> Probably not…

:smiley: I can do soooo much more than that, but perhaps this is not the best thread for me get into the infinite details…

A western man living in Hong Kong was experiencing severe pain in his penis.
He went to the local British doctor who said it would require amputation.
Wanting a second opinion he went to the American doctor and received the same answer.
After exhausting all western possibilities a friend suggested he try one of the local doctors who practiced Chinese medicine.

After examining him, the little old Chinese man said:
“Ahh, western doctors, always CUT, CUT, CUT. No need to cut!!!”

The patient was obviously relieved and thanked the old man profusely.
“What do I do then doctor?” he asked.

“You wait two weeks and it fall off by itself. No need cut!”