First, to acknowledge that this is a women’s issue thread, and as an “other than,” my opinion expects other than primary consideration.
So to address the economic aspects, first there’s the prevalent belief in our capitalist society that money is continually “created,” and the concept of “saving” it is not a reality. Compare wealth to a force out of physics, like heat. It’s generated in higher centers of energy. Just like there’s no such thing as cold, just the absence of heat; richer neighborhoods will generate more wealth than poor neighborhoods. (I don’t believe this for one second, but as consumerists we’re expected to. So that’s two reasons why I have no voice in the matter).
Therefore it follows that line of irrational thought that women, who by some accounts earn 3/4 less than men, yet bear the burden of paying to achieve grooming standards far beyond those imposed upon men. The only explanation I have for this, economics-wise, is that economics is crazy. Painting masks on ourselves is no more irrational than painting saints on the ceilings of our churches. Look deeper into the economic ramifications behind both for the craziness.
Lately there’s been online reaction to what’s been called the Walmart Brain-rot ad, that celebrates ever-younger children’s prioritization of trendiness as they attend school. School as a place to achieve superficial social value based on clothing, not on academics.
I’d add that it includes the idea that pre-pubescent girls should assert sexual capital for self-worth, at the risk of the usual pushback: “there’s nothing sexual about adult female beauty. If you think that about women, you’re an incel” (okay, I never said female beauty exists only as a function to please men, but go ahead and make that accusation since it supports the following accusation): “and when we dress little girls up like beauty queens and you think it’s sexual, you’re the perv here.” How fucking facile.
FTR, my own daughter flirted with being a girly-girl as she approached puberty, went through it as a tomboy, did the usual over-plucking and roughing natural to teenagers, then settled into utilitarianism as an adult.
Some women maintain that they glam up because it makes them feel good. Others insist men should pay for dates since they have to spend extra for clothes and cosmetics. There’s no inconsistency there because it’s never the same woman saying both things.
I honestly don’t post wanting to offend anyone, although one needs to hold authority to offend. As an “other than” I have no authority here, so I ratchet down to the level of annoyance. Which I hope I have not.