I decided that Sundays movie night would feature the trilogy. So some questions have come to mind that have probably been already asked, but I figure a revisit would not be remiss.
First
I have to wonder, should that torpedo that luke fired have destroyed the death star 1 outright. I get that it was supposed to start a chain reaction that would destroy the station, and yet I’m a bit skeptical that what ever that torpedo hit, would not automatically scram the reactors and at most require a few months in the repair yard.
Second
Empire strikes back , has the rebellion on the run and the time line is within months of the Death Star 1 being destroyed. Yet return of the Jedi looks to be within months of hoth being over run, judging by the millenium falcon leaving for tantooine to rescue Han Solo.
With that in mind, the time line for Death Star 2 looks heavily accelerated compared to the construction time for the first. While its only half finished admittedly, I am more used to a ten or more year construction cycle for the stations. Am I basically complaining too much that basically George went back to the well ?
Third
Its pretty much stated in the first movie , that the stations defenses are primarily attuned for a capital ship assault, snub fighters are concidered fleas due to the lack of hitting power. Yet it seems the Death Star class, seems to have its biggest weakness around the big gun. I was reminded of that Executor class star destroyer that augered into the Death Star. Given the amount of kinetic energy that it had to have released, the second Death Star was probably mission killed , had Wedge and Lando not shot up the main power core.
Had the rebs thought to accelerate a Mon Calmari frigate to high sublight speed and attempt a C-frac strike on the Death Star, particularly around the gun/engine, by physically ramming the Death Star, might have been a better option.
Commence Primary Ignition
Declan