That may be very interesting.
I could almost certainly come up with some serious competition to what you have. I know of a mama’s baby basement dweller who could almost certainly top her in the most fallacious statements and implications in a single statement.
On the topic of why Star Trek, his claim was that it was “hack writing” and must be classified as fantasy (which of course is always bad):
<< Even if we were to send a probe out to the heliotrope * (of the solar wind) it would take ninety-six ** LIGHT YEARS for a signal to get back to us at the speed of light. >>
(This is a paraphrase, but he said the same essential stat-oid a couple of times later.)
Now, folks, try to find as many goofball goofs in the paraphrase, plus the general topic. Remember, this is someone who supposedly is well-educated, and very much the gloating know-it-all, so no point of error is too technical to point out.
Here is one malapropism to start with. In addition, there is a variation of his dogmatic statement you wouldn’t see from the above paraphrase.
- You might want to look up the least common word in the paraphrase in connection with the solar wind, and then try to figure out the actual word wanted.
** At other times, he has said 65; that’s a give-away.
Okay, I have just given out one explicitly and given a good hint for researching another, just above that.
There are a total of seven more in his blurtation and the general claim he was using what I paraphrased to support.
That has to be a record, and I challenge anyone to come up with the seven more plus the
malapropism I indicated.