Marley: The usual one-uppers of the freedom loving people? I said it very intelligibly, unambiguously and in one-speak. Do yourself a favor and get rid of the liberal stench and of the attempt to belittle a worthy adversary w stupid unrelated and unbased expressions. Just be to the point, ok? Try. Iy won’t hurt.
Sherman, you envy the eloquence, poor you?
Sherman, I say in all earnest that you are a collaborator, yes, you are, and wipe the stupid smirk off of your face, w the other religious fanatics and fascists and the socialist ones, like Chavez and A-jad, b/c in failing to join me in my diatribe about them, and in dismissing it, you ARE a collaborator.
Ah, the old “if you’re not with us, you’re against us” canard. And you think Airman Doors is the arrogant one?
Sherman and Marley, let’s hear what you have to say about the Iranian terror support, about the totalitarian regime in Iran. About the destruction of saociety w same-sex marriage I know you won’t so I’ll skip the expectations, though I’ll blame you for obsequiousness at the least or for blindness at the most.
Let’s hear what you have to say about the positive role of US in the last century. Or about the equation of political correctness w hypocrisy. Let’s hear, but don’t forget the clorox after you say it.
Foreign policy bores me, but I, for one, would love to hear why you think same-sex marriage would ruin society. I’ll try really hard not to be obsequious or blind.
Inner, you play dumb or you are dumb? Silence is acquiescence, and acquiescence is complicity. Don’t clean their act while blaming me for calling what they do the right name.
Are you kidding? We’ve had legally-recognized same-sex marriage here in Canada for just 5 years and already we’re only just barely clinging to the last remnants of social order by our fingernails!
I’m not playing dumb. As to whether or not I am, well that is up for debate! 
But I am sincerely interested in why you think SSM is a bad thing. I can honestly foresee no ill effects from its institution. And I would like you to tell me what you fear from it. (Then I can tell you why you’re wrong. 
)
Inner, the answer to your q is so obvious even to you that I won’t bother. Not only this, but same-sex marriage is an in-your-face gratuitous act of defiance that only serves to infuriate even the most permissive among the weakest conservatives.
Let me make it clear: W/o reservation, what they do in their own confines is none of my business, but don’t put your shit in the street for all to step on it and smell it, is all.
Coke or Pepsi?
I agree, shit belongs in the toilet, not the street. This is not 16th century France, here, people! As for how a gay couple in public can be somehow flaunting their relationship is unclear to me. Would you consider a straight couple to be flaunting their relationship? Why should gays be restricted from things straights do all the time?
Basically, I find your hubris to be unfounded, and your loquaciousnesses, for all intensive purposes, reeking of obsequiousness, and at the end of the day, it is transparent, you missed the last dose of your medication, irregardless, welcome to the board, and oh, nice socks.
Funny, I feel the same way about trolls.
Mad as a hatter you are, sir. As it stands now, there are few new voices joining our cacophony, & it becomes a chorus in unison for left-liberalism & gay “rights.” (Ironic for the “Straight” Dope.) Surely the free posting will invigorate this place with a great variety. A more open marketplace of ideas, without the intimidation of only speaking to a thousand closed ears who all know each other & will not hear.
Dr. Pepper!
HA HA HA HA HAHAHAHAHA! Well played, indeed.
I think this is just one of those cases where a conservative defines ‘liberal bias’ as existing anywhere that a spectrum of views can be freely expressed - I expect the whole world has a liberal bias, from the OP’s POV.
Like that godawful Conservapedia thing - started out as a project to re-do Wikipedia, but without the ‘liberal bias’, ended up that the only way you can do this is by shutting yourself in with all the other conservatives. That’s not freedom from bias,
Guns? Absence of religion? Lack of self-esteem? Poor parenting? The entertainment industry? Who’s to blame for SDMB’s prurient ventures? Numerous professionals (and not-so-professionals) have speculated and mulled, publicly and privately, over what has caused SDMB to feed us a diet of robbery, murder, violence, and all other manner of trials and tribulations. To begin at the beginning, it rarely tells its forces that it plans to ransack people’s homes. Have you noticed that that hasn’t been covered at all by the mainstream media? Maybe they’re afraid that SDMB will retaliate by forcing me to go crazy. Finally, no letter about SDMB would be complete without mention of some of the utterly unimaginative schemes that SDMB supports. Although there are a plenitude of examples from which to choose, the most unimaginative would have to be SDMB’s proposal to lay down diktats that force me to get torn apart by wild dogs. That’s the sort of thing that keeps me up at night.
The far left is communist, comm-U-nist. The far right is fascist. If you must criticize the left, it is important to accurately represent the political spectrum and not use some invented right wing definition of left and right. In other words, keep the insults honest.