The rules are simple. Poster 1 mentions something from a movie, comic book, tv series, etc. which seems to contradict logic, common sense, or the rest fo the series. Poster 2 then explains the contradiction away, then lists something nonsensical for the next poster to try his/her/its luck on, and so on.
For instance: if Poster 0 had written
[QUOTE=an entirely hypothetical poster]
It makes no sense for Superman to collapse from weakness when he’s exposed to red-sun radiation. At most it should just reduce him to normal human levels, and you note that Jimmy Olsen, for instance, isn’t constantly fainting. Writers who have thsi happen must be high. Anybody care to explain?
[/QUOTE]
I’d reply
*You are not as wise as you think, grasshopper. You see, when he’s powered up, Superman doesn’t get hungry, and therefore when he eats (rarely) it’s only for taste, not nutrition–and his super-metabolism atomizes the food almost instantaneously anyway. Thus, when he’s deprived of the benefits of yellow-sun radiation, he immediately begins to suffer the symptoms of hypoglycemia–weakness, sweats, dizziness, et cetera.
That said …
It makes no sense for the Nazgul to have retreated from Aragorn on Weathertop. He was just one guy, and they were freaking ring-wraiths, in the middle of the night, when they were strongest; and the Witch-King was confident that he could not be slain by any Man, which Strider, obviously, was. Tolkien must have been high when he wrote that. Anybody care to explain?*