The federal government made a serious mistake by caving in to Cliven Bundy

Reading the whole thing:

That’s exactly what I thought. It’s vague but reassuring, in that fashion that politicians love. “The way the situation is being handled” can mean practically anything, for instance. The statement can be ready as supporting the protesters’ rights, supporting Bundy in his claims, concern for disruptions of the roads, you name it.

In any event, nothing there speaks of a desire to take control of federal land, but to shirk any responsibility to maintain it.

:smack: Should not be penalized, that is.

Not that this has anything to do with land rights or gun rights, but it turns out that on top of everything else, Bundy is an old-school racist.

Flinty-eyed gummint’-hatin’ cowpoke turns out to be an unabashed racist. Film at 11.

Equally unsurprising is Fox News’ wall-to-wall coverage of this latest development.

ETA: ninja’d!

For the benefit of those who ignore links that might tell them something they don’t want to hear:

He has a point, you know. None of my black friends know how to pick cotton. What’s up with that?

Bundy is quite the poster boy for freedom and rights.

It’s only taught in grad school these days.

I hope somebody makes a campaign ad taking Bundy’s slavery comments and putting them next to GOPers who have called him a patriot. Though sadly, in some areas, that would probably win him more votes

I’d have been surprised if he wasn’t, especially as his specific gripes (government assistance ruining people) dovetail nicely with his general contempt for the government.

It’s only a matter of time before he starts blaming the Jews for the whole affair.

And now the GOP is trying to distance themselves!

Good for them, I suppose. That’s the proper, moral thing to do.

Well, in some ways this reminds me of Phil Robertson’s stance that government intervention has made life worse for black people during his lifetime. I don’t find all this attitude all that surprising for people who start with a basic assumption that government can do no right and work backwards from there, even though believing it means disregarding reality.

But even Phil Robertson never said that they were better off under slavery.

This comes close.

Yeah, but this is politics, and one of the unshakeable rules of politics is, if you lie down with dogs, you get fleas. It’s up to the left to make sure opportunist senators like Rand Paul and Dean Heller are kept itching for a good long time.

This is yet another example of how contemporary political complaints about “federal government overreach” are really based on a racist world-view. I’ll concede there are many honest conservatives who have legitimate grievances about the federal government. But until the GOP deals with the racism in their base–and stops trying to court them with dog-whistles like Paul Ryan’s recent exegesis on “inner city culture”–I just can’t take it seriously.

It appears that even Bundy is trying to distance himself from Bundy’s comments.

There are new rumors going around about Cliven. We all know that with the media, words are taken out of context, meanings are twisted, and they can take anything and turn it into what they want it to be. Cliven is a good man, he loves all people, he is not a racist man. He wants what is best for everyone.

Conservatives now appear divided on Bundy. Some are condemning him, some are dodging/dismissing the racism question – and some are actually defending him:

Wait, what are the racist’s rules now?

My grandparents picked cotton, the closest I’ve come to it is being able to recognize cotton when I’m driving by it. I’m still not sure any of us are Negroes, but my grandparents were probably more resourceful than I am.

Man, racism is confusing.

Bundyfest