As I sat in class discussing the almost-tolerable movie Snow Falling on Cedars yesterday, I ran across this phenomenon.
I was pointing out that the defendant’s defense attorney does not reference any facts at all in his closing argument, nor does he even posit a plausible sequence of events that leads to the death that the defendant is accused of. All he does is make an appeal to not be racist in the verdict, say that humanity itself is on trial, prejudice is bad, and so on in that vein. Never does he give any reason as to why his client is innocent. The following dialogue ensues:
Professor: Well, the evidence was only circumstantial against him
anyways.
Me: Even so, he should still point out how the evidence is
circumstantial, and at least give a plausible sequence of
events that leads up to the guy being dead but not
murdered.
Professor: Well, theres the fact that the evidence should be
beyond reasonable doubt for them to convict.
Me: So, he should be explicitly saying that to the
inbred hicks of the jury.
Followed by several outraged gasps and everybody in the room staring at me. It was if I had yelled out “Hey, racial slur” in a room of people of whatever race is being slurred.
Now in my defense, as I said it I was only thinking of the Simpsons.
Homer: Your honor, I would like to defend myself.
Judge: Okay.
Homer: Inbred hicks of the jury…
I had no idea that this was apparently the forbidden phrase in Iowa. Somebody should teach you these things. They should have a list of forbidden or outrageous phrases in the college materials they give you. As it was, I scarcely escaped alive. Let it be a warning to any of you in or considering a visit to Iowa, to avoid the Forbidden Phrase at all costs.