The Fountain: Or Don't Eat the Brown Acid, Man!

However, if you do live in a jurisdiction where such recreational pharmacuticals as LSD, mescaline, and the like are legal, I recommend that you take them before you see the film. The visuals are perfect for it.

Warning!!! Raw, naked, throbbing spoilers to follow!!!
Back out now, you’ve been warned.

Okay, the trailer for the film made it seem like there’s 3 different storylines going on in the film, with the same characters in all of them. While that’s accurate, it doesn’t tell the whole story. Comments I’ve seen about the film have been either in the “Huh? I don’t get it.” category or “Wow! Mindblowing!” so I was excited to see the film, figuring that any film which could garner such responses had to be good. The Fountain, however, is not. (It didn’t suck as hard as some of the other films I’ve seen this year, but it is nowhere near my top 10 films of the year. Not even close.)

In a nutshell, this film feels like it was concieved after someone spent an acid trip watching Jacob’s Ladder, Altered States and reading Carlos Casteneda (or The Celestine Prophecy, for you young 'uns.). The gist of the story is that Hugh Jackman is a cancer researcher, desperately trying to find a cure for the terminal cancer that his wife, Rachel Weisz, has. Rachel is a writer, working on a novel called, The Fountain. It tells the story of Isabella (played by Rachel), queen of Spain, who sends the conquestador Tomas (played by Jackman) to the Americas to find the fountain of youth (there’s brief mention of an Inquisitor who’s after the queen, but not much happens with this story line). Jackman also has dreams of himself, shaved head, floating in a bubble in space, with a giant, old tree. In these dreams, he’s conflicted, and haunted by a voice who says, “Finish it.” The film rotates fairly freely between these storylines, and each one of them is filled with heavy handed symbolism.

Jackman tries out a botanical chemical on a research monkey (over the objections of some of the staff, and the administrator who makes the claim that by doing such, he’s risking having the NIH pull their funding), then heads home, where Rachel shows him a nebula through a telescope (and the geek in me has to point out that the telescope she’s using wouldn’t be powerful enough to show the nebula in the kind of detail we see it on the screen) which is called “Shababa” by the Aztecs, and it’s the location of the underworld in their religion. She thinks that it’s amazing that the Aztecs have picked a dying star to be the symbol of their underworld. Jackman quickly realizes that because Rachel’s out in the cold barefoot, that her condition is worsening. She gives him her novel (handwritten in gorgeous caligraphy, BTW) and tells him to read it, even though it’s incomplete. While he’s reading it, he falls asleep, has his hallucinatory dreams, and is awoken by a phone call from the lab.

They tell him to get down there, because he won’t believe what’s happened to the monkey. He says he can’t and then goes down there anyway. He’d injected the chemical directly into the tumor in the monkey’s brain (they’d cut the skull open to do this) and it was almost impossible to see the results of the incision, it was healing so rapidly. Scans on the monkey show no signs of the tumor abating, but they do show that the monkey’s brain is getting younger (the plant the chemical is derived from came from South America, BTW). He says to change the formula slightly and prep another monkey to experiment on. His team objects, but he says to do it anyway.

He then goes home, reads more of Rachel’s book, falls asleep (ya know, it’s really not a good sign when a character falls asleep reading something that makes up a third of the movie’s plot), wakes to find Rachel gone, reads a note she left, and finds her at a museum, reading Aztec scrolls. (There’s symbolism in these shots which mesh with those in his dreams, both of floating in the bubble and Rachel’s book.) She tells him excitedly how in their mythology, the first father kills himself, and from his body grows the world and the universe. Rachel then collapses and is rushed to the hospital.

Jackman returns to the lab, begins working furiously, get’s chewed out by the administrator for not being with his wife, get’s distressed over the fact that he still can’t find his wedding ring (which looks identical to the one Isabella gives Tomas telling him that if he finds Eden [since that’s where the fountain{AKA Tree of Life} is], she’ll be his Eve), then shows up at the hospital to find the administrator holding hands with his wife. He goes in, the adminstrator leaves, and Rachel tells him she’s not afraid to die and that she wants to be buried on the administrator’s farm. Jackman gives Rachel her notebook so that she can work on it when she wants to. She gives him a present of a calligraphy pen and ink (the pen has symbols on it reflective of the dagger Tomas is carrying that is a clue to the location of the fountain) and says that she doesn’t know how to finish her book, so she wants Jackman to do it for her.

Jackman’s reluctant and heads back to the lab to continue his work. Both monkeys show age reversal, but no progress on their tumors. Jackman gets upset, and then wakes up in Rachel’s hospital room. Her heart monitor starts going wild, Jackman punches the “call” button and starts doing CPR. Medical staff show up with a crash cart, push Jackman away and start trying to revive Rachel. She flatlines, they pull the sheet over her head, and Jackman goes apeshit, trying to revive her and fighting off the staff.

We intercut (and I’m skipping a lot of these because it’s just so damned pointless to mention all of them) to Tomas making it to the fountain, and then to Jackman in the bubble and the tree’s starting to die. Next is the funeral on the farm of Rachel, the administrator says some pretty stupid things, Jackman storms off saying that death is a disease and he’s going to cure it. Jackman goes nuts again, takes the pen Rachel gave him and tattoos a black ring on his finger. We intercut to Jackman in the bubble looking at his finger, seeing the tattoo, then rolling up his sleeves and seeing all kinds of Aztec style ring tattoos. In a voice over he talks about how he now remembers that Rachel was the cause of all those rings. :rolleyes: He and the tree are now almost all the way to Shababba. The tree dies, and he goes nuts.

Then he shows up at the lab, says he’s fine and that they’re to get back to work. At some point, we then cut back to a fight that Jackman had with Rachel at the beginning of the film, where instead of going walking with her in the snow, he goes and shoots up the monkey’s brain. This time, however, he goes after her. We cut to Tomas, crawling up to the tree, and in an obvious act symbolic of sex, stabs the tree with the dagger, it promptly oozes something that looks like milk out of it. He dabs some of it on his wound, and it heals (he was pierced in the side by the Aztec with the flaming sword who guarded the entrance to Eden). He then, jabs the tree harder and drinks the sap flowing from it. Cut to Jackman in the bubble, as it nears Shababba, climbs up the tree, goes into a mediation pose and floats into space. Cut back to Jackman and Rachel in the snow, Rachel hands Jackman a seedpod (and because of a story Rachel told us earlier in the film we know that this is the tree that she wants him to plant on her grave). Back to Tomas at the tree. Suddenly, he starts freaking out and looks down at his side, which is twitching like John Hurt’s in Alien. Disappointingly, instead of an alien bursting out of him and singing, “Hello my baby, hello my ragtime gal” plants begin bursting out of him. He freaks, tries to fight it, but is turned into a plot of flowers anyway. Jackman in the bubble, however, goes through all these really trippy graphics which repeat much of the symbolism we’ve already seen, and a star forms in the heart of Shababba (no sign of a damaged Enterprise circling it, however).

Then back to Jackman at Rachel’s grave, digging through the snow and dirt (You know, I can’t say that I’ve ever watched a movie and hoped for a necrophillia scene before, but it certainly would have livened up the film if one had happened up at this point.) to plant the seed pod. He then stands up, looks up at the Shababba and says something about Rachel, and we zoom in at Shababba as the closing credits start.

Now, the movie looks great, the effects are well done, costumes lovely, the acting’s fine, and the soundtrack (performed by Kronos Quartet) is fantastic. The story, however, sucks. You can make all kinds of interpretations with it, that Rachel’s novel is a recollection of her past life with Jackman, that Jackman discovers the secret of immortality, and then takes the tree that was planted on Rachel’s grave to Shababba. Or that they’d become immortal way back when, and had just forgotten everything but their love for one another, and Rachel died because she’d been away from the tree too long, while Jackman survived because he’d figured out what the tree was. And god knows what else, but really, that’s putting way more effort into the film than it deserves.

If you want to see a Jackman movie where he gives the best performance of his career, then go see The Prestige.

Huh.

I think it’s faster just to watch the movie, than to read all this.

Thanks, Tuckerfan. Your review and synosis were well-written and helpful. I was curious about this movie and you’ve persuaded me to wait to catch it on cable. It takes a pretty extraordinary movie to make me want to put up with all the annoyances of cinema-going these days, and it doesn’t sound like The Source rises to that level.

I saw a poster for this movie and thought it might be an interesting exploration of the consequences of immortality, or at least an Indiana Jones-like thriller about the search for the tree. Then I saw the trailer and realized it was just pretentious artsy-fartsy crap (and probably worth a mention in this thread.

Is the Prisoner (Remake of Campy cold war era British Spy TV show) in post production yet? :smack:

[QUOTE=Sonia Montdore … doesn’t sound like The Source rises to that level.[/QUOTE]

oops … meant to say The Fountain, not The Source.

I would say it’s worth seeing in a theater because the visuals are stunning and would be lost on a smaller standard definition TV. And RUINED by taking it out of widescreen.

We saw it last night and really liked it. The couple we saw it with also thought it was an indiana jones-type action flick, and I’m mystified by that. Maybe because I know it’s Darren Aronofsky, and I just can’t see him making a standard IJ type flick. It was EXACTLY what I expected from watching the trailer.

They may have seen the same ad that my hubby did. A couple of days ago, there was a commercial for the movie on television and he made the comment that he couldn’t figure out what the movie was about because he had seen one ad which made it look like a romantic chick-flick, one which made it seem like a sci-fi action and then the ad we were watching which sort of implied it was about ghosts or spiriutalism.

Eh, a couple of hits of good acid and it won’t matter.

I certainly wasn’t expecting a standard-type flick. I wouldn’t have disappointed if we’d gotten something like that, or something deeply psychological, or some combination of the two. Instead, we got cheap symbolism, and close up shots of people staring at the camera with smoldering intensity for long periods of time,

:smiley: I only made it thru the 1st 2 paragraphs of the OP, then figured I’d check out what other posters were saying…

No reflection on the OP-- I was just too lazy to read the whole thing. I did catch the review on Ebert and Roper today , and Roper panned it pretty bad. He basically said it was a jumbled mess. But it’s getting 7.8 on IMDB, so someone likes it!

Yeah, the early twentysomethings who have better access to recreational pharmacuticals than I do! :smiley:

It is a jumbled mess. It’s full of heavy-handed symbolism and close ups of fabulously beautiful starlets and acid-trip galactic special effects. It is an adventure story, and a romance and a character study and a scifi headscratcher and everything bad you’ve read.
It’s also one of the best movies I’ve ever seen. Really. I can’t explain it. When it finished, I told my husband, “Please don’t ask me what it was about, but I loved it!”

No, you probably (statistically) won’t like it. But I loved it. I even liked Rachel Weisz in it, which is a first!

(If you didn’t like* AI *or Solaris, don’t bother. If you liked both of those, go see this in the theater now!)

And I swear I saw it sober. The first time. I may go back to see it a second time and recreate.

I just want to state that I liked both Solaris and AI. Not the greatest films I’ve seen, but thank you for reminding me about Solaris, as I really should pick it up on DVD.

I gave it a seven, incidentally.

I have a great deal of respect for what it tried to do, and it did some things very well. The visuals are stunning, the music is pretty darn good, the sound design was also pretty well done (although, I am bias about that…no, I didn’t do it)

I can get over the fact that I didn’t understand the plot 100%. I’m pretty sure I have a handle on most of it, however (although one can’t be positive unless they’ve had a conversation with Darren Aronofsky). I actually like the fact that I had to think about it for an hour or two later. It didn’t help matters that I dozed off on occasion but I didn’t miss much, I don’t think (I didn’t find the movie boring, I had just had a long day).

What really killed it for me is the leaps of faith I had to take regarding the relationship of Thomas and Izzie. There wasn’t a whole lot of screen time between the Tomas and the Queen before he leaves to find the tree. The fact that she reciprocated the feelings came a little out of nowhere. I also found that present day Thomas was a bit of an asshole. I can understand a bit of anger over the fact that your wife is dying but we were never shown a time where he wasn’t an asshole which was a bit of an issue for me. This makes it a bit hard for me to believe that Izzie loves Thomas (although she does SAY she does but that doesn’t really count).

I also found a few of the scenes a touch silly. Let me just say that the white liquid that came out of the tree was a little too thick to be milk. I must also admit that I had a bit of trouble with Thomas and his tree in the future. I understand the few things that the tree represents (the movie isn’t subtle about it) but the fact remains that it’s still a tree.

That said, I liked the message, the attempt and the fact that I really had to work for this movie. It also might be a fun movie to watch over and over again just to see if I can catch everything I may have missed (which might not be much, but might be a whole lot also).

If any of the Nashvegas Dopers saw this and heard some guy scream, “Sperm!” I was the asshole who did that.

Oh, sure, it was totally semen, no doubt. What else would you expect to see coming out of the Tree of Life? But that dagger thrust into the tree - I felt like I was kicked in the stomach. That was, seriously and without exaggeration, somehow the most violent, gruesome thing I’ve seen on screen. With no blood, and no human victim. It was just so…harsh! It was taking life that hadn’t been given - by nature, by the gods, whatever. That stealing of life that, like Frankenstein’s Monster or zombies, can never be worthwhile life.

I loved the moment right around there when he figured it out: “I’m going to die.” It’s not about losing his wife, or his queen, or even his fabled Tree. It’s about him. He’s going to die. He’s mortal. And so, dear viewer, are you. Right at that moment, he finally grows up and becomes a man, not a spoiled child who thinks he can rewrite the laws of the universe to keep his mommy (whatever form she takes) close. “I’m going to die.” Yep. That’s the way of things. And that’s what the movie’s really about, unlike, say, What Dreams May Come, a close cousin in the Spousal Death Metaphor genre. And, while there’s so much heavy symbolism elsewhere in the movie, when they really get to the meat, the moral, it’s really underplayed.

And I think he was sympathetic in the scenes with Izzy. The stargazing scene, and the bath scene, and kissing her neck and telling her it was all okay. Sure, he was a jerk in the lab, but I never questioned whether or why they loved each other.

And the Inquisitor was there to provide the cancer metaphor in the Queen (Isabella?) storyline. He was consuming the Queen’s land like…well, like a tumor.

Sorry, I just saw it a couple of hours ago, so I’m still processing.

[QUOTE=WhyNot]
And the Inquisitor was there to provide the cancer metaphor in the Queen (Isabella?) storyline. He was consuming the Queen’s land like…well, like a tumor./QUOTE]
Ah, thank you. I missed that when I saw the film. Not that it changes my opinion of the film, but I was sort of left wondering WTF he had to do with anything. (Though the metaphor does kind of fall flat with Tomas voluntarily leaving to go see the Queen, rather than whacking the bastard, whereas all the other incarnations of Jackman would have probably killed him and then left.)

[QUOTE=Tuckerfan]

No, no no. He can’t cure the cancer. That’s the point. He goes to seek the Tree (or the cure in the lab), because he* can’t *just rip it out of her, much as he’d like to. It will kill her. The Queen tells him that if her conquistador kills the Inquisitor, Europe will have her head.
Really, you liked AI and *Solaris *and not The Fountain? Huh. Do you think maybe you were just in a bad mood? Or trying to view it too literally? I found myself, a couple of times, trying to make literal sense out of it (were they really immortal, or reincarnated or was he dreaming or was it a story or…) before I figured out that is was just all metaphor and no literalness. All message and zero logic. Taken on those terms, I was able to relax and enjoy it.

WhyNot, you really made me want to see this movie.

In other words, pretentious, artsy-fartsy crap.

And I don’t say that because I didn’t “get it.” I think I understood every image and symbol, it’s just that the themes underlying the symbols (IMO) were nothing but trite, pseudo-profound platitudes. You can’t live forever? What an insight. Life and death as an eternal cycle? Elton John sang about that in The Lion King. Live for today? Hallmark card territory.

I agree with Tuckerfan that it’s the kind of movie that probably seems really deep if you eat a couple of hits of blotter and watch it on DVD, but the fact that it was booed at Cannes and is currently getting bludgeoned by a majority of critics (it’s currently at 49% on Rotten Tomatoes) better reflects reality, IMO.

That ejaculating vagina tree was a ludicrous image, by the way.