Why couldn’t they just be stories? I don’t think the Harry Potter books are historical fact, but I also don’t think they are vehicles for transmitting any myth of occult anatomy.
What is the difference between the grail legend and the legend of the grail?
‘Stories’ of what?
What do you mean of what? Sometimes a story is just a story without deep significance. The only options are not
-It really happened
or
- It’s a myth of the Outer School based on the legend of Occult Anatomy.
What with your trivia, goodness gracious, what has happened here?
Glands, Sir Gawain, glands.
That’s new age stuff…it’s not actual Kabbalah.
No, I mean this whole anatomical theory. I see no evidence that it anything more then something a bunch of people making up stories after the fact. There’s nothing to show that your interpretation of the Grail Legend is anything more then a just-so story. Why would you expect us to believe this anatomical theory any more then we would believe that it’s all related to tropical fruit?
maatorc, I issue this challenge; Answer these things I ask, in sentences of your own construction. Pretty please (No answering a question with a question - your answers must be declarative).
- State Leonardo’s known connection with other occult anatomy-myth-based operations.
(bolding mine)
2. Name 3 mainstream sources for this claim.
- Where is all of this “non-secret and quite readily available literature” (that has been subjected to peer review) on the subject?
- Out of this group can you give us the name of three of them?
(again, bolding mine)
5. See question 2.
- How do you know this? What is your proof?
So you keep on saying. But you also say:
- If it’s not true, how could it be more important than, say, a Stephen King novel?
And finally,
8. I understand this is not your point here but (out of curiosity) - Do you believe the myth is true? Yes or no answer only for this last one.
I await enlightenment.
As I clearly said, we hold in one hand that which precedes entering the body, and we hold in the other hand that which follows exiting the body, and they are not the same, though they seem to be of one form, which is part of the overall body of the human story.
Does your location explain this reply, or does this reply explain your location.
For the rest: It is all in the reading.
Do you plan on responding to anything I wrote in my last post?
The religious-spiritual occult-anatomy based legends are of an entirely different category-mindset to what you mention.
As in the case of the NT and Grail, the context-theme points to the myth.
My location and my reply are the same; they are both mythical, and yet they are both true.
I must agree: The form of your reply does seem well located.
Whatever.:rolleyes:
Like I said, real knowledge doesn’t have to hide behind stupid games. Either you have something worthy of a discussion or you don’t.
The only question I have now is who duped you into believing you knew something about this stuff?
OK, that’s what I thought. There is no substance. All smoke and mirrors. I’m outta here…
[Bush] Now the left hand knows what the right hand has been doing [/Bush]
I’ve been lurking this thread for amusement purposes, but this has taken the fun out of it. No amount of reading the texts you’ve linked to will answer the last two questions of DFtH’s. They require your personal input.
You, sir, are not being intellectually honest. And that’s about all I can say this side of the pit.
If it were not true it would not be more important than a … novel.
It is true.