Oh, good, a Musk apologist. I thought they’d all gone into hiding after the fascist cosplay and meltdowns about how people weren’t treating him with respect after he told advertisers to fuck off and he had Trump do a car commercial for his failing car brand, but here you are to bear the mantle.
I’ve said it before. Thinks he’s real life Tony Stark, is actually real life Ted Faro.
For those unfamiliar, Ted Faro is the primary villain of the Horizon:Zero Dawn video game franchise. He was the CEO of a Faro Automated Solutions, whose AI military robots cause a global apocalypse destroying all life centuries before the game’s setting. Oh, and he also sabotages the Zero Dawn project which attempts to preserve life by destroying the entire repository of human knowledge, just in order to prevent future peoples from knowing his role in what happened. And, as discovered in the sequel, built himself a bunker to escape the apocalypse, complete with harem.
Which? The Harem Policy?
I honestly cannot think of a policy of his that can withstand attack, but that has nothing to do with this discussion. Also don’t get where the “propaganda” comes in.
I’m guessing this might lead to a hijack / spinoff.
Elon Musk has claimed on occasion that, unlike himself, rich people usually have less children. This isn’t true. In fact, rich people have the most children (although the difference between various income levels isn’t really that big). The people who have the most children are the ones who either grew up in rich families or who became rich fairly early in their professional life. The people who have the least children are the ones who grew up in working-class or middle-class families who decided to enter a job field in which you have to get a college degree and then another degree (a Ph.D., an M.D., a law degree, an M.B.A., or whatever) and then spend a few years having to impress your superiors before reaching a level where you are sufficiently established in your job. So the average number of children drops slowly from the poorest families to a level that’s just below the top 1.3% of all families in income. Then it jumps up. Look at the chart at the top of the webpage below. The average number of children for all income levels has been dropping all over the world for at least the past 75 years. And this is true for every country. Yes, some countries have clearly higher number of children per family than other countries, but the number of children per family has been dropping even in the countries with the largest average number of children. The population of the world will probably start to drop somewhere between 2060 and 2100, depending whose projections you look at. So the world population will be slowly decreasing for the next few centuries, which isn’t such a bad thing:
It basically couldn’t have been. Asperger’s was only added as a diagnosis in 1992; before that an autism diagnosis required a deficit or at least a notable delay in speech and language, and generally symptoms were expected to be more severe. And psychiatrists didn’t go back and start diagnosing adults until more years later. Still today, many adults are only diagnosed with ASD after their child(ren) receive a diagnosis and they recognise the same symptoms in themselves.
For the same reason, Musk couldn’t have been diagnosed as a child. I don’t know if he was diagnosed as an adult, but it’s plausible enough that he has it.
For a child now it would generally be helpful. Back in the 80s? Probably not.
Yeah. Not being able to read social cues and not understanding the rules can easily give this impression. There’s also the opposite issue that NT people may incorrectly interpret non-verbal communication of people with ASD and eg think it indicates boredom or dislike and get offended at that.
And many social rules are in fact quite arbitrary and illogical, which means someone with ASD may not feel a need to follow them, particularly someone wealthy like Musk who can get away with it. (Though this is to some extent true of any wealthy person.)
IIRC about 10-15-ish years ago there was a fad on various message boards of self-diagnosing with Asperger’s syndrome as a way of saying, “I’m smart and quirky, and also am allowed to be a dick”. Someone as terminally online as Elon would probably know about it/participated.
Not at all, not in any way, supporting my fellow South African country-douche, without whom we have become a happier nation (thanks, USA), but…
Math is one way to obtain the sex (if not the gender) of the zygote you fertilize. Similar to the rhythm method of “cross my fingers” contraception. It is possible to calculate ideal impregnation date by studying menstural cycles.
My wife and I wanted a child. We had random sex. A girl was the result. I wanted a boy, math got involved and some serious romance around the perfect date, coinciding with “date night” got us a son.
I’m not sure if Elon follows the scientific method, or if he just offers to artificially inseminate his lady of choice du jour.
Either way, an arguement can be made for vasectomy in his case. He can (but doesn’t necessarily) support his many children, but he is in every case an absent father.
Maybe, but that’s going to be a matter of a few percent. And of course, it’s also possible that almost all of his progeny are male simply by random chance. But given that he’s using artificial insemination anyway, it’s far more likely that he’s paying some lab to specifically select the Y sperm. Or requiring abortions and retries for any female fetuses.
I’m pretty sure that a contract for a woman to bear a child for a man would already be counter to public policy and thus void, and even more so for one that required selective abortions, but if it ever comes to trial, you can bet that the judges will find that contracts mandating abortions are all fine and dandy by good Christian principles.
Suprisingly, not. Our doctor suggested we try the “Shettles Method” and for my required sample size of one, it worked - it could be random chance too, so I’m not going to write a thesis on this, but it is interesting.
I’m seeing a notable lack of any numbers in that article. The only figures I’m finding come from the author of the book selling the method, and his sources for its effectiveness are papers that he himself published.
Now you made me wonder whether he is into necrophilia as well. As if he did not generate enough repulsion already.
But more to your point: I fear you severely underestimate how perverse people can be.
This was barely P&E material to start with, and as the thread has evolved, it seems more Pit-like than P&E. @ThelmaLou, please let me know if you would like it reopened in the Pit. For now, this is closed.