I see the problem here; you must live in the U.K. Well, here in America, we don’t have a Conservative Party. Our major parties are the Democrats and the Republicans. I can see how you made the mistake. Of course, had he mentioned, even once, the Party of John Kyl and how it relates to his stance on the issue, then I might see how he had introduced partisanship to the discussion.
Of course, upon rereading with this newfound knowledge, it will be easy for you to see how the OP did not mention anything about party politics, but about the particular politics of Sen. John Kyl, what he views as a hypocrisy—one which, in fact, not only permeates the entirety of modern conservatism, but most of any mainstream political affiliation.
Or in the more direct words of BayleDomon, bull fucking shit.
Ah, again, I would be interested to see you attempt to point out exactly where the OP introduced his arguments against Republicans, but I will save you the trouble since he did no such thing. This clearly demonstrates the immaturity of your knee-jerk, political wisdumb, considering your hastiness to assume his correctly labeling of a single man as conservative, and subsequent criticism of this man’s views, as an attack on Republicans that you felt the necessity to refute along bullshit party lines.
“Behold the superfluous! They steal the works of the inventors and of the sages for themselves; “education” they call their theft…”
Ah, the danger of idiocy mixed with the internet. I might be impressed, but Since anyone can Google tu quoque, I am not. You would have had a shot if you had bothered reading one of them. You lament about people lacking high school debate skills, yet you clearly fall short of the mark yourself. It has sadly become the new internet cliché to spout of logical fallacies as though you are some sort of logic machine, yet what is lost in all of this self fellating is subtlety. Your obvious tu quoque (which was observed by others as well), was fueled by your hasty generalizations and straw men regarding the OP’s ‘attack’ on, let’s say, non-Democrats. Your response? “But the Democrats do it to!! I have a cite to prove it!!”
Ah, if only this were the only depth to the tu quoque fallacy, you might have a leg to stand on.
And yet again, a childlike, over simplistic view of both politics and verbal logic. The world is hardly stratified into only “conservatives” and “liberals," and logic is not as cut and dry as the golden calf you have made it out to be.
[sigh]
No one is impressed with your nonsense, and your thick-headedness in the face of multiple posters shoving your face in your obvious shit like a dog who refuses to learn his lesson is laughable.
I now wash my hands of this pissing contest, I would rather just watch you embarrass yourself.
