Talking Heads’ “Once in a Lifetime” is one of my favourite songs - it’s one of your favourite songs as well. And the video. The bit where the strange man makes a chopping motion on his right forearm, just like the woman on the screen behind him. As if we were all connected in some way. And that was 1980, imagine what people could do nowadays.
But famously the music is just four seconds long - two bars of a bassline, with overdubs - for the entire song, including the chorus. The production is very elaborate and the song doesn’t sound boring, but I’m always impressed at how much Brian Eno did with so little. It’s an efficient song. The opposite of “Bohemian Rhapsody”. Based on the evidence in front of me I believe that Brian Eno should be put in charge of managing the world’s resources. He would leave ample supplies for our distant ancestors whilst providing enough for us to explore the solar system and also live harmoniously in peace and plenty. We would go to our graves will full bellies, but not too full. Death would be an opportunity for us to ponder the universe for all eternity. Our children will be strong and beautiful. It can happen. Eno can happen. Eno can have a pen. Eno, Can, Hawkwind, three great bands.
But, yeah, it got me to thinking about similarly efficient pop songs. Songs that charted in the US or UK. “Once in a Lifetime” was top twenty in the UK in 1980, #103 in the US, because the UK had much more sophisticated taste in music back then*. Talking Heads probably hold the record unless there’s a dance track (for example) that just has two bars of music with no overdubs at all. I remember an early Coldcut track that went drum loop - James Brown - drum loop - James Brown for six minutes. And an Aphex Twin song that went drums - ELEPHANT! - drums - ELEPHANT! for a similar length of time. But they didn’t chart.
The next that comes to mind is “One Step Beyond” by Madness, which is a catchy saxophone line repeated a couple of times in different keys for seventy seconds - which was bulked out to single length by just copying and pasting** those seventy seconds, thus making a single that was just over two minutes long. #7 UK 1979, amazingly #76 US but it’s one of those stupid “hot 100 top airplay bubbling under” charts they have over there. I mean, did it get to #76, or what? Is that equal to, like, #15 on the main chart, or #700, or what?
Phil Spector did a similar thing to George Harrison’s “I Me Mine”, but that was never released as a single. But worldwide chart-topper “My Sweet Lord” is really just one verse and one chorus repeated several times.
Rotterdam Termination Source’s “Poing” - #27 in the UK in 1992 - is basically a single verse that goes poing poing poing poing for four minutes. But there’s a bit of variation in the drum programming, and sometimes it goes poing (pause) poing (pause) and sometimes there’s no poing. Wicked track though. Early gabber. The grindcore of electronic dance music. And as far as I know no grindcore tracks have ever charted in the UK.
“Papa Was a Rolling Stone”. Eleven minutes, two chords and the truth, topped the charts in the US, sold millions. There’s probably a rich seam in the whole Isaac Hayes / Parliament / James Brown motherlode, but their songs were mostly shuffled off into ghetto charts. Meanwhile Rolling Stone magazine waxed lyrical on the immortal genius of Chicago and their tasteful solos. But, no, yes, any more? I’m thinking of charting pop songs that used the minimal amount of musical material to produce maximal effect. One verse. No verses. One note. Silence for four seconds. If it charted, it’s pop.
- Laurie Anderson, “O Superman”, #2. Not #2 in The NME’s Top One Hundred Most Fastest Charting Avant Garde Pop Singles (Monochrome Sleeve) but #2 in the one true official pop chart played on the one true official radio station and served with chips and salad on the one true Anthony Wedgwood Benn aspirin flower banana piece-of-cake baker man.
** Okay, splicing.