Heh. Came across this article today, and thought of this thread. For those who thought the Obama-fellating was confined to 2008, I give you the current Esquire:
Mayor Quimby even released Sideshow Bob – a man twice convicted of attempted murder. Can YOU trust a man like Mayor Quimby? (Vote Sideshow Bob for mayor.)
Hey, you might be on to something there… Bin Laden might have thrown his hat into the ring to run as a Democrat. I mean, you don’t even need to really be a citizen to get their nomination…
Obama was probably bumping off the competition… Probably because the public educated dummies might get confused between an “S” and a “B”.
Did the Democrats send the detainees to Guantanamo?
Did the Democrats invade Iraq?
Did the Democrats institute water-boarding and enhanced interrogation?
Did the Democrats deregulate the finance industry?
Did the Democrats enact DOMA?
Did the Democrats reach the highest level of post-war unemployment?
All the Democrats need to do is sit back and promise to do nothing in office for the next four years. That’ll still put them ahead of the party that creates new problems.
First of all, speaking as a generally pro-Obama liberal, it’s certainly true that, particularly leading up to the election, there was a LOT of extremely fervent pro-Obama rhetoric from a lot of liberals. Adulation would probably be a reasonable word for some of it. I’m not going to try to deny it happened.
That said, this whole “the one” business is extremely irritating. And there’s an important reason why it’s different than most insulting political nicknames.
Look at these two sentences:
Man oh man, Shrub sure screwed things up when he did X
Man oh man, “The One” sure screwed things up when he did X
Pretty much the same, right? Well, no. The difference, as I see it, is that “Shrub” as an insulting nickname for Bush is saying something about the person using it. It’s saying “I personally dislike and mock Bush”. Whereas “The One” as a nickname for Bush isn’t saying something about the person using it, it’s saying something about the person towards whom its usage is addressed. In other words, you could expand those two statements as:
Man oh man, I believe that former president George W Bush sure screwed things up when he did X. Oh, and I really disdain him.
Man oh man, I believe that president Obama sure screwed things up when he did X. Oh, and you liberals are blind partisan idiots who worship the ground he walks on.
One of them insults Bush. The other one insults liberals in general. That’s why it’s so jarring when used in contexts like GD. And that’s why, Recovering Republican, if you honestly would like your thoughts and ideas to be respectfully and meaningfully communicated to people who currently disagree with them but might be open to some honest discourse (and if you truly believe that every last liberal on this board is 100% partisan and will never change their mind about anything, then why are you here?), you might want to reconsider your use of that particular “joke”.
Since none of that refutes anything I said or supports anything you said, I can only assume that you now agree with me that waterboarding yielded no useful information.
Both, and a careful reading of the interviews the head of that nominating committee gave led me the conclusion they didn’t expect Obama to be alive a year later. The thought that us crazy, racist, gun-totin’ 'Murricans would cack our first negro POTUS is not far enough out of line. At the start of Obama’s term death threats were coming in at twice the rate of any previous president.