Nah. There’s no cost to O’Malley just hanging around. If the FBI comes out with a recommendation to indict, O’Malley becomes the only alternative to Sanders. If he ends his campaign, then that means Sanders just wins.
You’re really hanging your hat on that, aren’t you?
It can’t be ruled out, and as long as it can’t be ruled out, the party elite needs an alternative in the race.
#FeelTheBern
I think they are about as happy with that as Republicans are with Ted Cruz.
Some general points about the state of the race:
I think a lot of the seeming confusion of the GOP establishment stems from their terror of a Trump third-party run, an entirely legitimate terror given his egotism and wealth. They want to take him down but not in a way that seriously angers him.
If you think about a semi-plausible scenario where Trump is taken down without him getting mad it could go something like this: Cruz attacks Trump and weakens him. The other candidates attack Cruz and weaken him. An establishment candidate, preferably Rubio, emerges from the wreckage and manages to win without needing to seriously attack a weakened Trump. The last couple of weeks do bear a passing resemblance to this scenario.
Bottom line: The GOP establishment isn’t as stupid as it looks right now and I wouldn’t count them out no matter what happens in Iowa today.
If they were that stupid, they would be stymied by the task of tying their wing-tip shoes. Wait, they have people for that.
You really think Bernie Sanders is as hated in the Democratic Party as Cruz is in the GOP? :dubious:
Not hated, but the result of his nomination would be just as distasteful for what it would do to the party. The elites dread it about as much, although for different reasons.
One big problem is that a lot of that corporate money would just dry up with Sanders at the head of the ticket.
Well, that was quite a caucus night. Cruz 28%, Trump 24%, Rubio 23%, everyone else <5%.
In a way, all three of the top three won.
Cruz obviously won because he, well, won.
Rubio had a great night because he beat expectations by a mile. He didn’t poll above the mid-to-upper teens anywhere, anytime, during the long pre-primary season. But last night he got 23%. That should help him make the argument in NH that people who are considering Bush or Kasich or Christie should switch to him, so he can slay the evil Trump monster.
And Trump (a) finished second in arguably one of his weakest states, but more critically, (b) we finally got a first read on the drop-off between polled and actual support, and it’s not too bad. Going from a final 28.6% polling average (per 538) to an actual of 24.3% means that 85% of his polled support showed up.
That means that if his average in NH stays at 32.6% (again, per 538), he should get ~27-28% of the actual vote there.
So that’s what Rubio has to beat in NH, unless Trump’s support sags. Right now, the four Establishment lane candidates, combined, are polling at about 37%. If you toss in Fiorina and Paul (7% between them) and undecideds (another 7%), that’s 51% of prospective NH voters. He has to win a little over half of that 51% to win NH. That’s well within the realm of the possible.
Oh, and Huckabee’s already called it quits. Santorum soon to follow, I’m sure.
If he got this far without it, and if he gets that far without it, then he can win the WH without it. After all, no matter how much money is spent on TV ads and by whom, there will be just one Dem nominee and just one Pub nominee and everybody will have heard of both of them.
Yes, but can downticket Democrats win without it?
In addition to adaher’s excellent point …
As well (and I’ve said this about a hundred times in this election season), the only thing that really matters in the general election is turnout.
Substantially everybody knows *how *they would vote. The only interesting question is *whether *they’ll vote.
And getting out the vote, whether by traditional advertising, new social media, or good old-fashioned ground game costs massive . Don't have massive ? Don’t win. It really is as simple as that.
I think it’s Rubio’s race to lose now. In the first two states he isn’t really competing against Trump and Cruz but Jeb, Christie and Kasich and he crushed them in Iowa. Now, if he gets even a moderate bump, he will crush them again in NH and that should be enough to “clear the establishment lane”. Once that happens, there will be a rush of money, endorsements and glowing coverage from the conservative media which sets him up nicely in the three-way race against Trump and Cruz. I think his biggest worry may be that Trump quits at some point, leaving him in a tricky two-way fight against Cruz.
Carson got 9%.
Jeb said he wanted to be the top governor at Iowa, and he got that.
I’m not so sure he wins the establishment race in NH. Even clearing the establishment lane may not be enough, Trump and Cruz are going to be chirping “Gang of Eight” and “Amnesty” with every breath they take. If he gets double-teamed by Cruz and Trump in NH, his momentum will be short-lived. It’s easy to overstate the importance of Iowa on the GOP side, we do it every 4 years.
And ending up in 3rd place in NH, NV and SC won’t really count for much in the end. Rubio is going to have to win somewhere outright to be considered viable as the nominee. And Florida doesn’t count really.
You’re right, of course. Kinda forgot about him - easy to do, these days.