I don’t know that we have any idea of what’s going on either London_Calling. If we’re playing out of a book, we’re not all on the same page. This is what makes it kind of an interesting game - I have no idea what the others playing white are thinking, and if they have any idea what I’m thinking I don’t understand their interpretation of my plan (such that it is… er was).
Yes, London, I thikn we know that. But of course, you’d have this sort of sniping over a fun game sitting at a table… you’d just be doing it to yourself
If I followed it correctly.
And I just wanted to add that while I understand a little table banter is appropriate and reasonable in a healthy game of chess, I’m just a little wary of going down that road here given the various ‘domestics’ that have been breaking out in differet threads around the MB. It doesn’t seem to take a whole lot to incite half the cell block.
But maybe I’m just being overly sensitive in which case, HA!
Well, that was the only way out. And the exchange would have been even. Black would have lost both bishops, while White would lose both Knights. And there was a very real possibility for Black to capture a Rook while losing a Knight.
At any rate, excellent game, all!
There were definitely some major turning points for both sides throughout the game!
That was me.
I was hoping for 14. Qd1-e2 , to meet 14. … Bg4xf3 by 15. g2xf3 , when the queen covers h2. White follows up with 16. e4-e5 and 17. Nc3-e4.
But you can’t make two moves in a row.
London_Calling,
you posted 'And glee
quote:
Originally posted by glee
Can I play Black now?!
The number of people watching you is directly proportional to the stupidity of your action.
Not nice.
Sorry, no offense intended. My first sentence just meant I thought the game had turned around (from White winning to Black having all the chances).
I added a quote out of ‘The Official Explanations’ by P. Dickson (very amusing book). It could have been ‘If you think you have the solution, the question was poorly phrased’.
Actually, why isn’t it nice?