The SDMB overused argument list

I’m posting this here because, quite frankly, I have no idea where else to put it. Also, forgive me if it has been proposed/done before. I searched, but I couldn’t find it.

I am generally a lurker. This means I spend more of my time here reading other people’s words of wisdom, and less time posting words of wisdom of my own. However, in the course of my lurking, I have found that certain arguments have been used far beyond the Point of Excess, past the Point of Near-Argument Death, right up to the point of Outright Death of Argument, Right Here and Now.

This does a great disservice to all involved. It causes well-thought-out debates to quickly degenerate into name calling and badgering, as more original posters are (for some odd reason) utterly compelled to savagely browbeat their more mundane counterparts. It bores the old-timey lurkers, and makes the baby lurkers cry. It needlessly wastes space in the Great SDMB Storage Banks, and causes one in every three hamsters to commit suicide by inhaling from their waterbottle instead of drinking from it.

Therefore, I propose the creation of a list, numbered and indexed. This list will contain as many of the thoroughly dead arguments as we can come up with. Henceforward, anyone wishing to use one of these hackneyed arguments can simply say “Index #2, with ‘Islam’”, and save us all time and space. Sort of like “ordering by number” at McDonalds or your local Chinese food establishment of the fast variety.

Note that I am not making any claim as to the validity of the argument, or the nature of poster of these arguments, with two (noted) exceptions: 1) The arguments are overused. 2) The posters of the arguments are very focussed individuals.

Without further ado, the list. Items in <> are placeholders, designed to be replaced at post time (like ‘Islam’ in the example).
Please feel free to add items to the list, and begin using it immediately.

**1. **Because God said so.

**2. **Because your <religion-name> God is a(n) <idiot/sham/demon spawn/other>

**3. **Because you, dear <sir/madam/other> are, in fact, an idiot.

**4. **Because you misspelled <word>.

**5. **Because all <profession> are <liars/cheats/cowards/Founding Members of the Illuminati/other>.

**6. **Because all <race, possibly epithetical> are <lazy/slack-jawed/good at sports/terrorists/smart/other>.

**7. **Because all <sexuality> are <afraid/promiscuous/dangerous/unsure of their true sexuality/flamboyant/derisive/the cause of AIDS/other>.

**8. **Because property ownership is <good/a crime/other>.

**9. **Because it’s in the Constitution.

**10. **Because that’s in the Declaration of Independance, not the Constitution, and <Index #3>.

**11. **Because you have explicitly violated <Occam’s Razor/Hanlon’s Razor/Godwin’s Law/Opal’s Law of Threes/some other logical “law”>.

**12. **Because <I/you> <was/were> <drunk/stoned/temporarily insane/other> at the time.

**13. **Because if I replace <word> with <other word> throughout your post, the insult becomes clear.

**14. **Because all members of <political party> are <racists/rich/stuck-up/Founding Members of the Illuminati/unconcerned/owned by corporations/other>.

15. Because I have a higher post count than you do, twerp.

I am not a member of the Illuminati, thank you very much. :slight_smile:

Tripler
But most people say that I am a bright guy.

16. Because you implied that you had <minority group> friends, you’re using the lamest argument ever.

Because, you know, nobody ever really has friends who belong to minority group.

17. How are we to take you seriously when you can’t even get the most basic {b)CODING[i){/b> correct??

Clearly, having confessed to feelings of severe posting inadequacy in this thread has given you renewed strength and vigor. This latest thread is long overdue. Hearty congratulations! :slight_smile:

  1. I already said that!

  2. That was a thread 3 years ago (and we all know everything that could possibly be said about it was said then.)

  1. It wasn’t offensive, you’re all just PC.

  2. This is The Pit, I’m supposed to behave that way.

**22. ** You obviously have no sense of <humor/irony/fashion/good taste/self esteem/how hurtful your remarks are to others/other>.

Some very good ones, can’t believe I forgot post count :slight_smile: And it took me awhile to get the joke, TVGuy. Guess I’m just slow.

23. Cite? Linkety-link? Verification? Proof? Convince us why you’re not pulling this out of your arse!

24. Because the U.S. ruling class is evil!

Oddly, most of these arguments come from a single source.

  1. …and since this is the pit, I guess I should say <insert colorful metaphor(s) here>

We have to get this put somewhere that it will stay visible. This is too good to vanish into the mists of Prior Threads.

  1. Your source is biased!

27. Whooosh!

Schopenhauer’s 38

  1. You wouldn’t understand/ you had to be there.

  2. The pity ploy.

  3. The race/gender/orientation/faith card.

  4. Douglas Adams references.

I have yet to see a political arguement that hasn’t turned into an arguement around whether GWB actually won the election, or if the illuminati in concert with the Knights who say Ni (obligatory python reference) stole it.

  1. Because you’re not one of (insert name of group (ie Women, Gays, Catholics, American Tackle Football fans, etc.)), and only people in that group are (insert self congratulatory phrase here) enough to understand.

I don’t know, I’ve found number 12 has proven to be legitimate a few times…

  1. You obviously don’t know what you’re talking about, because your post count is under 1000.

My particular, personal favorite. :smiley:

Tripler
Go ahead. Ask me why.