Seems to me that the the trademark office should not be making decisions based on ‘offensive’ or not - the market will determine the success (or failure) of a group if it is deemed offensive. Free Speech and all that.
‘Dykes on Bikes’ was originally also denied at the PTO, and that was overturned in court - you’d think that would send a signal.
What makes this cafe society?
They are tying to trademark a simple slur rather than a phrase using a slur, so that is a difference. Would they have been denied if they tried to become the “Dirty Slants” or “Portland Slants”?
Haha, Simon Tam. And patent officials citing urbandictionary? Priceless.
I wish them success in their battle. But I believe there is a special place in hell for bands that choose one common word, maybe with an article, and pretend that there aren’t already 100 bands who thought of that same exact name. Exceptions if you were formed before 1970, nowadays you should have Google and know better.
She gets a pass due to being in Biblical times and birthing Jesus. :dubious:
No, the Band and the The get a pass, if only because they were prescient enough to make it nigh-impossible to google them.
E.g. I like Nirvana, but did they really think that nobody else has ever used that name? I guess that hatchet was buried, and the original band is cool.
8-0 unanimous decision. When you win that way, it’s a pretty strong indication that any losses you suffered along the way were, shall we say, not well-thought-out.