I had a thought which I figured might start some interesting discussion.
Assumptions:
1.) Jesus was God.
2.) Jesus was human.
3.) All humans have a soul.
4.) Jesus had a soul.
5.) God had a soul…or did he?
What happened to His soul for the three days between the first Good Friday and Easter?
Any thoughts?
From The Niecine (sp?) Creed
From The Apostles Creed
Apparently, he died.
According to one of the creeds, his soul “decended into hell,” possibly to bear the price of the sins of the world.
Now, I’m no theologean, but that’s my opinion on the matter.
Nice pickup, Soup. The name of that creed is The Nicene Creed, so called because it was first formally adopted for use throughout the church at the Council of Nicaea in the early 300s CE. It’s also found in the traditional form of the Apostles’ Creed, though Methodism and churches descended from it, along with I believe several other Protestant churches, drop that line.
Technical usage, by the way, supports a translation of “to the dead” or “to the realm of the dead” rather than “to Hell” – He is not conceived of as going to the place of eternal torment, but to the Jewish Sheol, with the purpose of freeing and leading into Heaven the dead who had led a righteous life and were confined there by the nature of death as shadowy ghostlike figures who deserved better.
So when Jesus died, he didn’t become just another person in Hell?
Soup_du_jour-I don’t know how much truth is behind this claim but in a book I’m reading (Demon Haunted World pg. 92) there is a suggestion that the Apostles Creed is a forgery.
Poly
This is interesting. I don’t suppose you (or anyone) would know the answer to this, but in this land of the dead-did time exist?
I’m wondering because suppose it didn’t; would that mean that future people, who either didn’t have a chance to hear the word or rejected it, would have a chance for salvation?
Lord Ashtar-Good question. I don’t know if Jesus would have a sole-I mean he wouldn’t need it would he? Suppose the God part of him seperated from the human part and went on it’s travels (to Sheol), technically I don’t think that would be Jesus’ “soul”…
If I may pick this up for Poly:
Time was the same in Sheol as it was on Earth. Sheol was very similar to the Greco-Roman Hades, in fact, it’s really just the Hebrew word for the same sort of underworld.
Ancient Jews believed that the dead were sort housed in an underground holding tank awaiting the final judgment. At that time, God would grant the good people eternal life (on Earth, they did not really have the Christian idea of Heaven, but expected a sort of renewed Eden on earth).
The bad people would be utterly destroyed by fire, there was no eternal punishment, just anihilation.
Christianiaty later refined these initial ideas into what we now now think of as hell. Sheo, originally just a metaphor for death, became a place of eternal punishment. Eternal life was reimagined as eternal bliss in the literal realm of God. Jesus was the judge, and the judgement was now.
Now you know how I was feeling last night with this train of thought running through my head!
Basically, I was thinking this: If God created a human version (for lack of a better word) of Himself in Jesus, than in order for Jesus to be completely human He would need a soul. Wouldn’t that be the Holy Spirit? I would think that’s where the whole idea of the Holy Trinity came from. You have God (as He has always been), Jesus (the human part), and the Holy Ghost (God’s soul).
Am I making sense?
Actually, Jesus needed two soles, one on each sandal. 
Thanks, that’s interesting actually.
So would this “eternal life” be sort of like the modern conception of “ghosts” or were they in physical form?
This actually reminds me more of the ancient Egyption belief, only instead of the whole bad person getting thrown into annihilation, it was the bad part of the person (or at least that’s how I understood it).
Again interesting. Thanks.
Uh…whups…:o
Physical form. In fact, it was thought that if a body was burned, or otherwise utterly destroyed after death, that that person could not be resurrected at the judgment. That’s why the idea of being cast into the perpetually burning garbage dump of the Hinnon Valley (Gehenna) was so horrifying to them.
Hence the idea that a person’s body must not be desecrated, otherwise they can’t rise after Judgement?
I’m thinking of the movie Very Bad Things, where the dorky older brother guy says something about how they can’t just take the bodyparts of the two people and throw them in a hole, they have to put them back together or else their souls can’t rest in peace.
Or am I going in the totally wrong direction?
I’ve always thought about it in terms of the old Immortal rules of D&D. An immortal being in his home plane could create and manifest himself into a mortal body. His immortal body would go dormant in his home plane while his “spirit” was traipsing around on the Prime material plane in his new body. In the event that his mortal self (ie Jesus) was killed, his spirit would fly back to his home plane (ie heaven). Unless, of course, his helpless dormant immortal body was attacked and destroyed in the meantime, in which case his spirit would just float around forever. It’s a good thing some Mind Flayers or something didn’t attack heaven while Jesus was walking around here. Garsh knows where the universe would be now!
Well, it’s not a question of resting in peace, the ancients would have thought that the “spirit” as it were (it’s not really equivilent to what we think of as a soul, it was an immaterial, shadowy kind of ghost. It was supposed to be an unpleasant, joyless existence out of the body) would not have been able to reinhabit the destroyed bodies. They would have to be ghosts forever.
You know, I’m seeing shades of Ancient Egyption beliefs in this; Mummies were wrapped for similar reasons (IIRC); they had, I believe, 3 different spirits. My head is hazy but right now I’m under the impression that the body was sort of like the “home” of all three spirits. That was the reason the ancient egyptions took such painstaking measures to try to ensure physical immortality.
Diogenes wrote:
“You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one.” — Jesus (John 8:15)
Lib, what’s the context of that qoute? I’m just curious, is it part of the “Judge not, lest ye be judged”?
I’m not Lib, but the quote comes from this passage (NRSV version, differing slightly in wording from Lib’s)
As a parallel, here’s John 5:19-30, from the same translation:
What is key to me here is the emphasis that one’s focus should be not on judgment but on hearing and knowing the Word – i.e., Jesus – and in doing His will. He contrasts the legalistic standards of the Pharisees with God’s standard, which is not to judge those who have sought to follow Him and do good, i.e., not to judge by the standards of the Law – but to reward those who seek to follow the precepts of righteousness, to do right by others and to humbly follow God. (I’m amplifying the text a bit by reading into what “judge no one,” “have life in (one)self,” “do good” and other phrases mean in context by pulling in stuff from elsewhere in the Gospel.)
You know, Lib, In times past you probably would have been accused of heresy for zeroing in on stuff like that.
Personally, I don’t think Jesus regarded himself as a judge either, but Judge Jesus is an indelible image in much of Christianity.
(Bolding mine)
“Confined there by the nature of death”
I wonder what they meant by that? Could anyone provide a bit of clarification?