The strange concept of eternal hell suffering.

[Marley23]

@Mickiel

It does not mean it to you, it does mean it to me.

You were describing the views of other people, but OK, sure.

[Czarcasm]

@Mickiel

I don’t mean the Christian god, I am not Christian, and God is not either.

Then which god are you referring to?

[Czarcasm]

@Mickiel

It does not mean it to you, it does mean it to me. The " Concept" preceeds the " Realness." One leads to the other and cannot exist without the other; there is no seperation.

Are unicorns real?

[Mickiel]

@Czarcasm

Then which god are you referring to?

There is only one God. All others are creations of men.

[Czarcasm]

@Mickiel

There is only one God. All others are creations of men.

Are there others you can name who also follow this god of yours, or a cite that follows this same deity?

[Mickiel]

@Czarcasm

Are unicorns real?

The Atheist tendency to use myths to support its effort to belittle the realness of God is faulty; no Atheist believes in myths, but most Atheist will embrace myths in their effort to reduce the growing mountain of Gods reputation. Only then does myths mean something to an Atheist, as you use it as a convient weapon.

I need no myths to prove the realness of God. But you need myths to disprove him. An interesting contradiction.

[Czarcasm]

@Mickiel

The Atheist tendency to use myths to support its effort to belittle the realness of God is faulty; no Atheist believes in myths, but most Atheist will embrace myths in their effort to reduce the growing mountain of Gods reputation. Only then does myths mean something to an Atheist, as you use it as a convient weapon.

I need no myths to prove the realness of God. But you need myths to disprove him. An interesting contradiction.

Non-answer. If the concept of a unicorn is real, does that mean unicorns are real.

[Mickiel]

@Czarcasm

Are there others you can name who also follow this god of yours, or a cite that follows this same deity?

You love cites don’t you; yes, I already gave you two of them; Tentmaker.org

L. Ray Smith - Exposing Those Who Contradict

Do you need a cite that can prove I have not already given you these cites?

[Latro]

@Mickiel

I don’t mean the Christian god, I am not Christian, and God is not either.

@Czarcasm

Then which god are you referring to?

@Mickiel

There is only one God. All others are creations of men.

And you are the only one with the correct ‘concept’ of this god?

That would mean he does exists, bu only in your head.

[Mickiel]

@Czarcasm

Non-answer. If the concept of a unicorn is real, does that mean unicorns are real.

Its a perfect answer. Atheist have their way of playing religious politics, in their effort to shut down belief in God. They NEED to use myths, something they themselves do not believe in, in order to assist them in getting believers in God not to believe.

Conversely, believers in God do not NEED myths to prove their belief as valid. A strange dicotomy, just as strange as the belief in the myth of eternal hell torture.

[Mickiel]

@Latro

And you are the only one with the correct ‘concept’ of this god?

That would mean he does exists, bu only in your head.

I don’t have the :" Correct concept of God", in my view, no one does, especially Christians and Atheist, two groups who have muddied the waters of understanding this in my view. No human has the correct concept of God, they just like to think that they do.

[simster]

@Mickiel

Its a perfect answer. Atheist have their way of playing religious politics, in their effort to shut down belief in God. They NEED to use myths, something they themselves do not believe in, in order to assist them in getting believers in God not to believe.

Conversely, believers in God do not NEED myths to prove their belief as valid. A strange dicotomy, just as strange as the belief in the myth of eternal hell torture.

So - you agree that the ‘Unicorn’ is a mythical creature - why is that?

[Marley23]

@Mickiel

Its a perfect answer. Atheist have their way of playing religious politics, in their effort to shut down belief in God. They NEED to use myths, something they themselves do not believe in, in order to assist them in getting believers in God not to believe.

Are you saying atheists don’t really accept things like evolution and cosmology - which are separate from atheism anyway - even though you yourself don’t know what those things are?

[Czarcasm]

@Mickiel

You love cites don’t you; yes, I already gave you two of them; Tentmaker.org

bible-truths.com

Do you need a cite that can prove I have not already given you these cites?

I need non-evasive answers. Those are both Christian sites.

[Mickiel]

@simster

So - you agree that the ‘Unicorn’ is a mythical creature - why is that?

I most certainly agree the Unicorn is a mythical creature, because I have no proof of it; but where God is concerned, I have this proof;

Consciousness

The Anthropic Principles

Irreducible Complexity

Biblical archaeology

Biogenesis

The laws of conversation

Kalam Cosomological argument

Proteins

The animal kingdom

The Universe

The laws of Gravity

The fossil record

Metamorphosis

DNA

The second law of Thermodynamics

Life

Life spans

Entrophy

Purpose

The first living cells

Atheist

Causality

Chirality

Historical Writers

Carbon Dating

Civilization

Language

Emotions

Females

Prophecy

Morals

No proof that God is not real

Increasing Complexity

Evolution

The law of perpetual transmutation

The law of mentality

Now give me your list that supports unicorns being real. Well you can’t, but with God you can.

[Mickiel]

@Czarcasm

I need non-evasive answers. Those are both Christian sites.

You asked for cites, I gave them; if you spit on what I give you, thats your problem.

[Mickiel]

@Marley23

Are you saying atheists don’t really accept things like evolution and cosmology - which are separate from atheism anyway - even though you yourself don’t know what those things are?

I see no reason for you to insult me; explain to me how you know what the things are that I don’t know?

[Czarcasm]

Another silly list used to avoid a question.
You said, and I quote:

@Mickiel

It does not mean it to you, it does mean it to me. The " Concept" preceeds the " Realness." One leads to the other and cannot exist without the other; there is no seperation.

If this is true, then since you can conceive of a unicorn, it follows that unicorns must exist. Now, either unicorns exist, or your premise is wrong.
Which is it?

[Mickiel]

@Czarcasm

Another silly list used to avoid a question.
You said, and I quote:If this is true, then since you can conceive of a unicorn, it follows that unicorns must exist. Now, either unicorns exist, or your premise is wrong.
Which is it?

Spare me your futile attempts to impress false things on things I never said; I never said I conceive a unicorn as being real; I said Atheist NEED myths to help support their unbelief in what they think is a myth. You think God is a myth, but God in NO manner of reason can be compared to any myth, because God is historically legit, emotionally legit, scientifically legit, morally legit, legally legit, ( courts don’t use a unicorn to swear people in, they use a bible), and reasonably legit.

[Czarcasm]

@Mickiel

You asked for cites, I gave them; if you spit on what I give you, thats your problem.

A cite is not just a random link-it must support the claim being made. If you claim that you are not a Christian and someone asks for a cite for others that believe as you do, than links to Christian websites are wrong.