Barry who?
Oh, you know, our POTUS. You see, Morella’s on a cazh first name basis with him because they’re buds.
Just like I can call Morella a royal dumbass fuckstick–because we’re tight, y’all.
Good question. Soetoro? Maybe we should look on his birth certificate.
Better yet, just make him a new one.
Hey, if you want to stick with the Red Menance that’s fine. I’d just like to see you become a better troll by picking a big bad that didn’t go defunct decades ago. It’s no fun if the best fearmongering you have is, “Laos is coming to get you!” At least Emac’s time travelling robots aren’t a proven failure.
I was hoping for some clarification on this:
It’s your response to Sevastopol’s comments on starting wars. Considering Obama was serving in the Illinois State Legislature during the Kosovo stuff and he inherited both Afghanistan and Iraq I really don’t see what he has to do with either of them. I was just curious if you were a firm believer in Steele’s, "Keep in mind again, federal candidates, this was a war of Obama’s choosing. This is not something the United States had actively prosecuted or wanted to engage in,” comment.
Since the guy in that race is winning, he’s obviously a Kenyan. Much like Obama! See, this thread’s troll works on so many levels!
-Joe
There is a good lesson buried under all this shit:
Why is there such a strong connection with being an anti-government lunatic, and a conspiracy believing wingnut?
On its own, I could respect someone that wanted less government involvement. I myself can identify areas that I’d love the government to get the hell out of (marriage, drugs, alcohol).
But those that seem to push hardest and scream loudest for it, are also the same that finish their posts with [insert random conspiracy theory] and remembering fondly back to [random era when government wasn’t involved in something].
Why go through so much trouble to prepare a nice meal, then pour shit all over it?
You see, food is an area where there are differing opinions about what is good. Wet ribs vr dry ribs for example. And a healthy debate can exist where each presents reasons.
But the dry-rib camp doesn’t benifit by subsequently suggestion that bbq sauce is a plot by the CIA to blah blah blah THE GUBERMENT!
So as a lesson to us all, if you want to be taken seriously on a particular topic, you’ve got hide the crazy. Just stick with a given subject matter and leave the baggage at home.
**Morella ** will forever be remembered as that crazy old trucker that thinks Obama is a Chinese robot from the future, and that the world was great before 1964.
**Starving Artist **gets remember as that cranky old man that thinks the liberal agenda was to have more STIs and that the world was better by in the 50s.
Both of who can’t finish a post without uttering some bullsthit about an agenda.
Perhaps it’s the conservative agenda, to make conservatives sound stupid, so that people stop paying attention to them… and then profit?
That’s right, if you’ve got nothing but bullshit going for you, your best offense is to point and laugh at some alleged physical or mental shortcoming of your opponent. When’s the last time around here that you’ve seen a conservative belitting someone in an argument because of how old they were? Or calling them a moron or an idiot in virtually every post they make?
Weak sauce, guys.
And besides, I’m not old anyway. Sixty is the new forty! You must not know about that either. 
SA, can I ask, do you think Obama is a citizen? I just want to know how well informed you are.
It’s about this woman who decides, of her own free will, to go to Las Vegas. While there, she pays $12 a day to be able to access the internet, again of her own free will. Then she complains about it to the people she finds online.
It’s hysterical.
Yesterday.
but but but…
…we only do it because other people are so obnoxiously conservative; they started it; this message board is too conservative; I’m telling mom.
or have you already forgotten the things you’ve said in previous posts? You know it’s searchable right? Did you not say the liberal agenda was to have more STI’s (you probably said STD’s like some idiot not informed on the subject)
And one further question: how would you then describe someone that doesn’t think Obama is a citizen? Is that just a difference of opinion? Does that opinion carry equal weight with someone that *believes *he was born in Hawaii?
I said neither. What I did say was that the liberal agenda (or more accurately, it’s influence over the years) has resulted in not only more STD’s but a hell of a lot more. Currently 25% among high-school age females, I believe.
And I don’t believe either of you guys have ever heard me comment on where Obama was born, or upon the legitimacy of his presidency.
That’s why we’re asking. You’re reflexively defending Morella, and she/he is so vile, stupid and uninformed I was wondering if there was any limit to your disgusting partisanship.
You are very, very, uninformed and you think opinions are facts. But I think that even you must be smart enough to understand that the birther arguments are simply lies for the dregs of humanity to rally behind.
So you freely admit to your childish behavior but you excuse it on the grounds that you find our “obnoxious” behavior as conservatives objectionable?
Wouldn’t you call that, uh, childish?
Especially so if you consider that fact that the obnoxiousness ratio around here between liberals and conservatives is, by my estimation, roughly 2000:1.
Which means that in effect you’re acting childish because of our obnoxious response to the overwhelming obnoxiousness coming from your side?
So, how is it exactly that your childishness is justified again?
I’m not defending her and it’s dishonest for you to say I am. The fact that we share certain beliefs does not equate to a defense. Nor has she been defending me when she refers to comments I’ve made. Besides, I don’t think she is a conservative, by definition, and I think she would agree with that as well.
I would suggest that it is you who is uninformed and prone to regarding his opinions as fact. Both are evident in this very post.
Developmentally disabled chimp throws poop. Expects reward banana.
-Joe
So where DO you think Obama was born? DO you think his presidency is legitimate?
Are people entitled to different opinions on this matter? Or is it not a matter of opinion, but a matter of fact?
No, I’d call it conservative:
I guess you forgot you said that. It’s okay, that happens, it’s called age associated memory impairment. And why is age relevant? Because you bring it up so often, you make your age part of the discussion. In fact, you once claimed that people believe UHC is good because they’re young. How is up there or your soap box?
Given the obnoxious nature of our new friend Morella, your golden ration has fallen. Unless you think that her obnoxiousness is some how justified?
You also missed my question: how would you describe someone that thinks Obama is Muslim Kenyan, and not a US citizen? Would you said intelligent, or something else?
Pssstttt!! **SA **old buddy!! Didn’t the audible *whoooooooshing *noise **emack’s **post made register on you? *Ma-a-a-a-*velous to see you tilting at yet another windmill. Perfectly consistent. It’s so – you. Kind of like your “estimate” which also has not even a tangential relationship to fact. Again though, it’s just more of you.
I just checked in to point and laugh and, guess what? I’m right on time. So here I go,
pointing
and
laughing.
Ah, SA, you’re a never ending source of joy. Thanks again!