- Angry
- Hungry
- Nugry
Okay, so, that makes four.
You’re just evil.
Sorry, I disagry.
quack!
[QUOTE=vetbridge]
quack!
[/QUOTE]
quack!
quack!
quack!
quack!
quack!
(I was Dick Smothers in a past life)
There were only 4 “Quacks” in that post, and no one knows why.
Actually, someone knew why. Once. In 1960. For 20 minutes.
" "
(I just wanted to echo the above post.)
A dog wouldn’t be able to look up to see the post.
[QUOTE=Ludovic]
There were only 4 “Quacks” in that post, and no one knows why.
Actually, someone knew why. Once. In 1960. For 20 minutes.
[/QUOTE]
And, tying everything in this thread together, that someone was…Dick Smothers.
[QUOTE=Ludovic]
There were only 4 “Quacks” in that post, and no one knows why.
Actually, someone knew why. Once. In 1960. For 20 minutes.
[/QUOTE]
But I saw 6 Quacks in all. 1 in the reply and 5 that Hal typed? 
[QUOTE=Hal Briston]
quack!
quack!
quack!
quack!
quack!
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Ludovic]
There were only 4 “Quacks” in that post, and no one knows why.
Actually, someone knew why. Once. In 1960. For 20 minutes.
[/QUOTE]
He’s right, Hal.
There were only 4.
Are you tryin’ to pull sumtin?!
<WHACK!>
Give the man annudda “quack”!
Or do Muggsey & da Boys an I godda get “persuasive” wid choo? :dubious:
FYI, I read this while I was in my car. Parked in the driveway.
Or was it while I was driving on the parkway.
Oh well, what’s the difference?
Could a running duck take off from a rolling runway?
Cecil is going to smite you for that one…
[QUOTE=Bosda Di’Chi of Tricor]
He’s right, Hal.
There were only 4.
Are you tryin’ to pull sumtin?!
<WHACK!>
Give the man annudda “quack”!
[/QUOTE]
No… There WERE five! Highlight the quote in your own post…
[QUOTE=Shai’tan]
No… There WERE five! Highlight the quote in your own post…
[/QUOTE]
oooh! Good one, Hal. “Sneaking one in” were ewe? 
There! Are! Five! Quacks!!!
What’s all this then? I’m trying to read another post and all I can hear is a duck fight coming from this one.
Please, folks, muzzle your ducks!