Not from me, either.
Only have a few minutes, but real quick:
Here’s how it’s gone with regard to my 'hijacking the thread and making it 100% about me":
SA (on topic): These damn shootings are the result of the country’s societal fabric having been destroyed starting in the late sixties and things are only gonna get worse until the country comes back to its senses.
SDMB: Asshole.
SA: Responds.
SDMB: Racist.
SA: Responds.
SDMB: Old man.
SA: Responds.
SDMB: Pervert.
SA: Responds.
SDMB: Warn him.
SA: Responds.
SDMB: Ban him.
And it has been thus as long as I’ve been here.
Chuckled out loud at this. Quick and clever. My congratulations. Reminds me of how Vinyl Turnip used to be before he started turning into a bitter old man. You know, elucidator-lite.
Have you happened to notice where I spend a great deal of my time?
Where she was influenced even further by those who’ve been influenced by liberal educators and peers who’ve likewise been influenced by liberal educators. There’s a reason why this phenomenon wasn’t occurring in the '20s, the ‘30s’, the '40s and so on up to the late '60s, and why it has been since.
HAHAHAHAHA!!!
Anyone so blind as to believe this extraordinary crock of horseshit should consult with any of the board’s conservatives to learn the truth.
Nor was it intended to. Why do you people always zero in on everything but the salient point? An avoidance mechanism, I’m virtually certain. The point of that observation was that she had good moral values and the discipline to live according to them.
Perhaps on the part of Kimstu, who stalks me mercilessly. I’ve wondered from time to time if she wants to get a room since I can’t swing a dead cat around here without her showing up to commit perversions on my posts. I’ve thought about reporting her for stalking and harassment but eventually decided I was kind of flattered.
I’m not her parents’ friend; she wasn’t questioned by me and I don’t know her parents; she’s smart, unlike friend Evil Economist, and undoubtedly would take the position that she couldn’t care less about my post because she would instantly realize I gave no information that would give anyone the slightest idea whatsoever who she is; she is not and has never been a neighbor.
So once again you people have leapt to seize upon a secondary factor in what I can’t help but believe is an effort to distract from the main points which you don’t like and don’t want to acknowledge. Meh, happens here like night follows the day. Doesn’t mean I have to indulge it. The truth behind my knowledge of this young woman’s life, including these scant details regarding her sex life, are perfectly innocent. But in light of these comments I’ll be damned if I’m gonna explain it to you.
And now I’m out, most likely for the rest of the night. But maybe not. We’ll see. I know some don’t like this but in the overall scheme of things it’s really not a biggie and one certainly can’t say you care a whit about what I don’t like. So I’m out now and will be back when convenient.
Did you fashion a cardboard tube into a rudimentary telescope?
You are, as usual, wrong in your claims that campus political/cultural radicalism “wasn’t occurring” prior to the 1960s. Look up the Student League for Industrial Democracy and the American Student Union sometime to read about pre-1950 student movements for actual socialism and communism.
Well, your original claim was
[…] Then she went off to college (in a very small rural community no less) and within two years has gone completely round the bend […]
But you haven’t provided a single instance of her currently not having “good moral values and the discipline to live according to them”, or of having “gone round the bend”, ethically speaking, in any way at all.
What all your ranting about her boils down to is that the young woman in question now has some tattoos and piercings and gets into arguments on Facebook. Plenty of people with good moral values and the discipline to live according to them have tattoos and piercings and get into arguments on Facebook.
So why are we supposed to believe that her going off to college somehow changed her morality or character in any fundamental way?
The truth behind my knowledge of this young woman’s life, including these scant details regarding her sex life, are perfectly innocent.
Good. Note that I, for one, never suggested otherwise. I just pointed out that your mentioning to strangers any details whatsoever about the sexual activities of an underage girl of your acquaintance has a very unseemly appearance, which remains true no matter how innocent your actual relationship with her is.

I don’t know her parents; she’s smart, unlike friend Evil Economist, and undoubtedly would take the position that she couldn’t care less about my post because she would instantly realize I gave no information that would give anyone the slightest idea whatsoever who she is; she is not and has never been a neighbor.
You should test this theory by forwarding her a link to your post, unless there’s some reason you think you shouldn’t??

Where she was influenced even further by those who’ve been influenced by liberal educators and peers who’ve likewise been influenced by liberal educators. There’s a reason why this phenomenon wasn’t occurring in the '20s, the ‘30s’, the '40s and so on up to the late '60s, and why it has been since.
Let’s see some cites for this. You STILL haven’t provided me the cites I asked for you previously, though, so I’m not going to hold out much hope.
I’ll provide some, though: Perhaps you’ve heard of the “Roaring Twenties”?
The 1920s was the rise of a variety of social issues amidst a rapidly changing world. Conflicts arose concerning what was considered acceptable and respectable and what ought to be proscribed or made illegal. The conflict quickly coalesced into one largely between the liberal urban areas against the conservative rural areas.
The 1920s was a period of social revolution, coming out of World War I, society changed as inhibitions faded and youth demanded new experiences and more freedom from old controls. Chaperones faded in importance as “anything goes” became a slogan for youth taking control of their subculture. A new woman was born—a “flapper” who danced, drank, smoked and voted. This new woman cut her hair, wore make-up, and partied. She was known for being giddy and taking risks; she was known as a flapper.
Young women, especially, began staking claim to their own bodies and took part in a sexual liberation of their generation.
Homosexuality became much more visible and somewhat more acceptable. London, New York, Paris, Rome, and Berlin were important centers of the new ethic.[90] Crouthamel argues that in Germany, the First World War promoted homosexual emancipation because it provided an ideal of comradeship which redefined homosexuality and masculinity.
The relative liberalism of the decade is demonstrated by the fact that the actor William Haines, regularly named in newspapers and magazines as the #1 male box-office draw, openly lived in a gay relationship with his partner, Jimmie Shields. Other popular gay actors/actresses of the decade included Alla Nazimova and Ramón Novarro. In 1927, Mae West wrote a play about homosexuality called The Drag, and alluded to the work of Karl Heinrich Ulrichs. It was a box-office success. West regarded talking about sex as a basic human rights issue, and was also an early advocate of gay rights.
They became popular in major cities and helped fund large-scale gangsters operations such as those of Lucky Luciano, Al Capone, Meyer Lansky, Bugs Moran, Moe Dalitz, Joseph Ardizzone, and Sam Maceo. They operated with connections to organized crime and liquor smuggling.
Police was notoriously bribed by speakeasy operators to either leave them alone or at least give them advance notice of any planned raid.
So much for everything suddenly going to hell in the 60s. Want some more info about various decades? Or we could talk about things like say, the history of porn. What about major trials of the 20th century? Or scandals throughout history?
Have anything to add?
:dubious:
(However, I did look, but sadly, I couldn’t find any examples of bad girls in the 1950s.)

Now Trump claims that if he had been there in Florida, he would’ve run in to help even without a weapon
Who does he think he is? Putin?

Perhaps on the part of Kimstu, who stalks me mercilessly. I’ve wondered from time to time if she wants to get a room since I can’t swing a dead cat around here without her showing up to commit perversions on my posts. I’ve thought about reporting her for stalking and harassment but eventually decided I was kind of flattered.
There is probably no rule, but there ought to be one that says creepy fucking pedos can’t suggest that other posters want to fuck them. Hell, there should be no tolerance of such posters spontaneously talking about having sex with other posters at all.
What the fuck is wrong with you, you fucking perve? Someone says you are old, you bring up your lack of need for viagra. Aguing about liberal indoctination, you talk about a high school girls’ sexual behavior. You propose that people simulate sex with pre-adolescent boys by fucking paper towel tubes. You suggest lining up 100 ten year olds to ask them about anal sex.
Fuck off, you creepy pedo perve.

There is probably no rule, but there ought to be one that says creepy fucking pedos can’t suggest that other posters want to fuck them.
Pretty much par for the course, though. For all that he indignantly resents being considered old, it doesn’t seem to have occurred to Starving Artist that there is hardly a more quintessential pathetic-old-man behavior than imagining that younger women are attracted to you.

There is probably no rule, but there ought to be one that says creepy fucking pedos can’t suggest that other posters want to fuck them. Hell, there should be no tolerance of such posters spontaneously talking about having sex with other posters at all.
What the fuck is wrong with you, you fucking perve? Someone says you are old, you bring up your lack of need for viagra. Aguing about liberal indoctination, you talk about a high school girls’ sexual behavior. You propose that people simulate sex with pre-adolescent boys by fucking paper towel tubes. You suggest lining up 100 ten year olds to ask them about anal sex.
Fuck off, you creepy pedo perve.
Whoops! Busy as I am I can’t let this bit of nutjobbery go uncontested. I’m temporarily going to go against my policy of not discussing Paterno issues outside its thread in order to show you to be the lying nutcase you are. The tubes I’ve explained a jillion times and there’s no point going into again because certain people are gong to pretend it was for the reason you said no matter how many times I explain otherwise. As for the lining up boys thing that you’ve been on about for six years and have also been educated about countless times, I suggested lining up 100 boys in order to get a solid 100% refutation of your ridiculous assertion that from the perspective of a ten-year-old boy a hug in the shower from a 60-year-old man was just as bad as to be anally raped by him.
You have known this as well as the other aspects you’ve continually brought up all these years. As I once advised Spice Weasel when she appeared to be growing fond of you for some reason obviously based in ignorance, you are one of if not the most dishonest and contemptible posters on this board. I could not despise you more for a million dollars.
I’ve been on this board for fifteen years and should I have troublesome sexual proclivities they would have played out well before now. The idiocy you’re trying to advance now is sheer nuttery, and I mean that literally not figuratively. It’s so far over the top and unjustifiably spittle-flecked that I’m beginning to suspect that in addition to the incompetence you showed in the Paterno thread in regard to your own state’s rules and regulations, you are totally unfit to hold down your job as some sort of psychologist, although you never have been clear on what exactly it is you do.
But be all that as it may, you are an utterly reprehensible little shitstain on this board and anyone, and by that I mean anyone at all, who listens to you or takes you seriously, or even worse for some godforsaken reason likes you, clearly does so at their own peril, you sick piece of shit.
As for getting a room, there can be reasons for that which don’t involve sex. Wine and dancing for example. Playing poker. Watching movies. I’d say the odds of my trying to book a room with Kimstu for sex is about equal to voting you the Man Of The Year Award.

Pretty much par for the course, though. For all that he indignantly resents being considered old, it doesn’t seem to have occurred to Starving Artist that there is hardly a more quintessential pathetic-old-man behavior than imagining that younger women are attracted to you.
Trust me, if you’re younger than me it comes as quite a surprise. And if you think I’m really interested in you or imagine you’re interested in me for other than harassment purposes you’re equally mistaken. When I said I was flattered, it was because you’re so obviously worried somebody might take something, anything, I say to heart. Thus I must be making my case pretty well. Again, trust me, sex with you, primarily because of the image of you I have in mind, is so far beyond the horizon it couldn’t be spotted with a spy plane.

Again, trust me, sex with you, primarily because of the image of you I have in mind, is so far beyond the horizon it couldn’t be spotted with a spy plane.
I hate to speak for Kimstu, but I’m guessing the feeling’s mutual.

Trust me, if you’re younger than me it comes as quite a surprise…Again, trust me, sex with you, primarily because of the image of you I have in mind, is so far beyond the horizon it couldn’t be spotted with a spy plane.
**Starving Artist **doesn’t think you’re a child, therefore he isn’t interested in sex with you, if I’m parsing his statement correctly.

Trust me, if you’re younger than me it comes as quite a surprise.
Well, it’s hardly the first time you’ve been irrationally surprised to learn a widely known and unremarkable fact.
Of course, if I had happened not to be younger than you there would be nothing wrong with that either. Not all of us are as oversensitive and insecure about our advancing years as you seem to be.

I hate to speak for Kimstu, but I’m guessing the feeling’s mutual.
You misspelled universal.

But be all that as it may, you are an utterly reprehensible little shitstain on this board and anyone, and by that I mean anyone at all, who listens to you or takes you seriously, or even worse for some godforsaken reason likes you, clearly does so at their own peril, you sick piece of shit.
Psychological projection- Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is habitually intolerant may constantly accuse other people of being intolerant.
You keep fucking that cardboard tube Starving Artist … like a kid with cancer, it never gets old.

Whoops! Busy as I am I can’t let this bit of nutjobbery go uncontested. I’m temporarily going to go against my policy of not discussing Paterno issues outside its thread in order to show you to be the lying nutcase you are. The tubes I’ve explained a jillion times and there’s no point going into again because certain people are gong to pretend it was for the reason you said no matter how many times I explain otherwise. As for the lining up boys thing that you’ve been on about for six years and have also been educated about countless times, I suggested lining up 100 boys in order to get a solid 100% refutation of your ridiculous assertion that from the perspective of a ten-year-old boy a hug in the shower from a 60-year-old man was just as bad as to be anally raped by him.
You have known this as well as the other aspects you’ve continually brought up all these years. As I once advised Spice Weasel when she appeared to be growing fond of you for some reason obviously based in ignorance, you are one of if not the most dishonest and contemptible posters on this board. I could not despise you more for a million dollars.
I’ve been on this board for fifteen years and should I have troublesome sexual proclivities they would have played out well before now. The idiocy you’re trying to advance now is sheer nuttery, and I mean that literally not figuratively. It’s so far over the top and unjustifiably spittle-flecked that I’m beginning to suspect that in addition to the incompetence you showed in the Paterno thread in regard to your own state’s rules and regulations, you are totally unfit to hold down your job as some sort of psychologist, although you never have been clear on what exactly it is you do.
But be all that as it may, you are an utterly reprehensible little shitstain on this board and anyone, and by that I mean anyone at all, who listens to you or takes you seriously, or even worse for some godforsaken reason likes you, clearly does so at their own peril, you sick piece of shit.
As for getting a room, there can be reasons for that which don’t involve sex. Wine and dancing for example. Playing poker. Watching movies. I’d say the odds of my trying to book a room with Kimstu for sex is about equal to voting you the Man Of The Year Award.
Old men in the 50s didn’t speak this way.

I suggested lining up 100 boys in order to get a solid 100% refutation of your ridiculous assertion that from the perspective of a ten-year-old boy a hug in the shower from a 60-year-old man was just as bad as to be anally raped by him.
Will you *ever *come to understand that you seriously need to not say anything more about that?
I’ve been on this board for fifteen years and should I have troublesome sexual proclivities they would have played out well before now.
Oh, they have, they most certainly have.

You keep fucking that cardboard tube Starving Artist … like a kid with cancer, it never gets old.
It does get all yellow and crusty and smelly tho.

SA (on topic): These damn shootings are the result of the country’s societal fabric having been destroyed starting in the late sixties and things are only gonna get worse until the country comes back to its senses.
SDMB: Asshole.
SA: Responds.
SDMB: Racist.
SA: Responds.
SDMB: Old man.
SA: Responds.
SDMB: Pervert.
SA: Responds.
SDMB: Warn him.
SA: Responds.
SDMB: Ban him.
And it has been thus as long as I’ve been here.
Yep, you are definitely at Trump’s reading level. Don’t bother reading the counterpoints and just assume they’re all versions of the above. Otherwise, severely misinterpret through your liberal boogeyman filter.
You just want the online fights, don’t you? You’ll even defend pedophiles to get a rise out of people. Whatever gets you through the night I guess.
I bet that chick with the tattoos and nose ring is laughing at you and bragging to her friends about how she had you fooled into thinking she was a nice upstanding Christian conservative brood. She probably fucked the 7-11 guy on the park bench where you feed the pigeons. And you thought it was pigeon poop.