Sorry for the duplicate link, poster above beat me to it.
It would probably do your future analysis good to realize that Trump has made it quite impossible to even feign bipartisanship nowadays. You are looking to some noble ideal, when everyone knows that the Republicans will only use an olive branch to poke the inquiry in the eye. I am no means a Democrat, I’m just not blind. If the Dems can present a case that looks honest, only the hard Rs will be crying about bipartisanship.
This is more silliness. Precedent is merely a guideline for all House procedures. There is no wisdom in following procedure from 45 years ago if the situation is different.
The Clinton impeachment was bad enough, this is total bullshit!
There’s no grounds to impeach Trump, and those people need to do their jobs or be hanged or go to jail.
There were no grounds to impeach Clinton, and that was a colossal waste of time and taxpayer money. Now here go the “privileged” wanting to redeaux the same damn thing. It makes me mad.]
Trump’s the best president in my lifetime, all these people are doing is looking like idiots that crave power.
I agree with the second part of your sentence: Pompeo, Barr, Pence, and especially Trump are indeed looking that way.
The first part of your sentence makes me wonder exactly how old you’d have to be to make that sentence true.
Sixty percent of the US is mad, too (well, forty percent in another way, sure).
So I don’t think that the people you’d like to see in jail are going to be the ones going there.
There’s denial, and then there’s DENIAL. 
Yes. And we can be certain that Republican whining about House Democrats being “unfair” will continue at a remarkably consistent volume, completely independent of what concessions Democrats might make.
The remedy for a Congressional minority that wants to impose its wishes and desires on the majority, is to win the majority in the next election.
Well said.
Is this snark? 
Have you heard that Trump withheld congressionally appropriated foreign aid to an ally who had been invaded unless they produced dirt on his political opponent?
Are you aware that Trump is actively refusing to abide by subpoenas and is instructing others to not participate in congressional investigations, which is usually regarded as obstruction of justice?
Oh lawd, Orange Man Bad, amirite?
Older than you, and smarter. 
Are you aware you’re falling for a line of bullshit?
Apparently not. :smack:
No, it’s reality knocking dude. Sorry.
What reason is there to impeach Trump?
Do elaborate. :rolleyes:
We’re going to need something more sophisticated than that sophistry.
Did Trump not make a request for dirt on Biden of a foreign government?
Is he not refusing to cooperate with an investigation?
Please explain why not. Evidence and argument is appreciated.
Trump said Wednesday that it would be “easy” for the United States to form new alliances if Syrian Kurds leave the fight against the Islamic State to fend off a Turkish attack, noting that
That’s gold, Jerry!! Gold!
Goodness, that is truly the dumbest thing to come out of that moron’s pie-hole — and that’s saying something.
Where were the Kurds at the Battle of Bunker Hill? Well? Well?
Goodness gracious.
From noted leftie-socialist site Fox News:
P
I’m thinking this latest atrocity - triggered by a tweet from the very stable genius - should most definitely be rolled into the impeachment inquiry…
The reason that’s grounds for impeachment is-?
Agreed, but when did Nostradamus get into hextraines? Or are those from the I Ching?
Soliciting foreign interference in an American election is impeachable for the same reason that campaign finance violations regarding Stormy Daniels are impeachable: it’s illegal.
As for obstruction of justice? Wells, that’s just tradition, since it served as grounds in Clinton’s impeachment and was also part of the charges against Nixon.