They really aren’t.
Ok, that’s hilarious.
Perhaps because the “hold on Ukraine aid” wasn’t related to the imagined quid pro quo that you guys think you’re reading between the lines of the phone call.’
I wonder…and I’m being serious…if right now Putin isnt asking himself “WHyyyyy arn’t I invading the Ukraine right now? I mean…it would be the perfect time no? Somebody convince me not to cause if you don’t I’m gonna.”
As I’m not the leader of a smallish country facing a looming existential military threat, I’m not gonna judge if such a leader says “sure sure whatever you say” to get the aid, especially since he could do a token non-investigation and say “oh hey sorry, nothing there” afterwards.
If you indeed did that, would it be a …
Squid pro quo?
YEEAAAAAHHHH!
Again, the bribe is not just the release of the authorized funds but the additional $140m in funds Zelensky claims was promised to Ukraine this month.
Interact with HD about definitions and the statistical significance of 38% vs 42% for your own amusement, but he’s not really bringing anything to the table here.
Ahhh…The Reynolds Pamphlet Gambit.
Trump: Its a trap!
I’m pretty sure that would end up raising the sanctions to “it’s now illegal to do business with Russians” levels. So that’s one reason. Russia would probably go broke paying for that war and occupation is another dandy reason not to.
Again being serious not snarky…I wasn’t aware the west kept Russia at the end of a financial leash. That’s good to know. And relieving.
I’m literally saying that the phone call can not explain Trump’s corrupt actions, and you say that I’m “reading between the lines of the phone call?”
You’re not even reading the actual lines of my post.
Here’s what that $141.5 million was announced a few weeks ago:
How is that in any way, shape, or form, a “bribe”? Are you just throwing out random words and hoping something sticks?
That’s hysterical. They have to actually utter the magical phrase “quid pro quo” for this to be wrong? Is that where you’ve planted your flag?
That’s funny, the article says that Ukraine’s “most important benefactor” – the President of the USA – wouldn’t even talk to Zelensky unless he agreed to the Biden investigation. What do you suppose they were thinking about implications to the military aid that had been promised but not yet provided if Trump wouldn’t even talk to them, especially knowing Trump’s childlike impetuousness? Are you really being serious here? This is the guy who cancelled a state visit to Denmark because they wouldn’t sell him Greenland.
No, he’s right. It was a quo pro quid. Totally different.
dems: President Trump is a Russian stooge. He’s doing Putin’s bidding.
Also dems: President Trump is giving lethal military aid to Ukraine to help them kill Russians and that’s a “bribe”.
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
Hey, as long as he hasn’t been spotted in a tan suit, everything else can be hand-waved away.
This is a reasonable point, but reading the transcript gives the distinction impression that Zelensky is going far, far beyond simply being respectful, and fawning over Trump to a degree that’s literally embarrassing to read.