Puns are bad enough, but now you’re riffing on cow noises? Low.
“Whaddaya mean the Ukrainian server is in a cloud? Go get it and bring it here!”
Can’t prove it.
I didn’t hear Turley’s statement, just the news summary recaps: but it sounds like his problem isn’t whether or not the offense is impeachable, but whether or not the evidence is convincing that the crime actually occurred.
If so, I’d love to have a congressperson ask him to confirm that. “If a hypothetical president asked a foreign leader to assist in his election in exchange for something…would you consider that an impeachable offense?”
I’ve been listening off and on and in general his schtick is that he doesn’t think that what Trump did is kosher, but he doesn’t think it’s a crime and he certainly doesn’t think it’s impeachable. The country is divided, see, and we’re all angry, and this is moving way too fast, so we should just drop it and move on.
Under questioning, though, he seems to be willing to agree with whatever ridiculous nonsense the Republicans throw his way, so who knows.
I see what you did there.
That attempt at humor was a flop for both of you…
I think vast majority of Trump fans are not going to care about professors opinions. Except maybe the one who was not in favor of impeachment. 
You’ve milked this situation for all it’s worth. Nothing to see here, please moove along…
Cud you all just knock it off?
This bovine hijack is udderly appalling!
Don’t have a cow, man!
“Get me the Air Force!”
I got a beef with all you heifers. Steer it back on topic before the mods prod you.
What kind of bull is this? I really gotta ox the question…
He finds it “interesting”. He found many things “interesting”. I was struck by his limited choice of words and phrasings but assume he must be intelligent to be where he is. So let me ask: do he and Jordan always sound like this - loud, angry, and proudly boorish? Or is it an act for their voters?
ETA: I am basing my observations on his opening statement. I haven’t seen (yet) anything he might have said later.
I’ll give Turley his due: he’s one of the few Republican defenders who’s actually thought out how to develop a cogent defense
Reported for Junior Mooing!
Turley’s defense of Trump was ‘you Dems cannot impeach because you haven’t heard from the witnesses Trump won’t allow to testify.’
“Cogent” is not the word I would use.
Except that the courts haven’t ruled on whether they’re compelled to testify. I’m not saying I subscribe to Turley’s line of reasoning, but it at least dresses itself up like an argument that could be made.