The Trump Impeachment Inquiry

You mean the intial NY Times report, co-authored by Ken Vogel and Iuliia Mendel?

The same Iuliia Mendel who, just one month after the original May 1st Hunter Biden piece, on June 3rd, 2019 tweeted this?

That one? (Emphasis mine)

Ken Vogel?

The same Ken Vogel who had to admit in his latest article that:

Moderators: Donald Trump may want to use Hunter Biden as a distraction to what happened but Hunter Biden nor his father are being impeached. Just because Republican media and Trumpanzees like this distraction doesn’t mean we should (fighting ignorance and all). May I suggest that all talk about Joe Biden or his son be moved to another thread and shut down in this one? Even if they were corrupt, it has been established that how Trump dealt with it was far from ideal and how he dealt with it is what will get him impeached. I appreciate you trying to keep this thread on topic.

Moderators: I agree.

The discussion of what Hunter Biden may or may not have done is irrelevant to the story of the House Impeachment Hearings and what Trump may or may not have done, and such discussions should be contained to their own thread.

The only fact of the Hunter Biden investigation which is relevant to this discussion is that the President thought it warranted requesting yet another country to interfere with American Elections. Details of the HB investigation itself are thus irrelevant to this discussion.

Sounds good to me. It would be a handy place for people to post links and evidence. Maybe even the FBI’s hotline phone number.

No, he didn’t. This first sentence in the above quote is false. He didn’t “offer to trade US aid”. He didn’t even mention the financial aid at all on the call, and as I said before:

Re-quoting because it’s very easy to gloss over how sinister it is, given how desensitized we’ve become to Trump’s horridness. Like, forget the actual scandal for minute; this statement alone should merit his removal.

Notice that it’s not even the whistleblower he’s making veiled threats towards. It’s the witness to Trump’s conduct. And he’s not just talking about this person; he’s talking to anyone else who might forward with dirt on him. Witness tampering right before eyes.

There are now going to be so many leaks, the WH is going to become the White Colander.

Or, if you are a Trumpette, the Ukraine’s hotline phone number.

https://t.co/HDwzUSGu6I

https://t.co/AJmgEi7Sb0

Oy. The prosecutor, Shokin, refused to investigate corruption, despite intense pressure by the international community and the US. Biden pressing for the firing of Shokin made it more likely Burisma, the company on whose board Hunter Biden then served, would be investigated, not less.

As for your comments about accusations of Trump colluding with Russia versus his “support” for Ukraine, there are corrupt oligarchs in Ukraine’s government who’ve been helping to further Russian influence.

(Snowden nods)

Do you have a full link? Those squashed links don’t work for me.

I respectfully disagree only in terms of: Speculation on a possible defense for impeachment

Just my two cents. Worth much less of course.

As you responded to HD’s response to me, I’ll just say you put it more succinctly and clearly than I could have…

You.

Are.

WRONG.

The House isn’t going to prosecute Joe Bidens kid, and if Bidens kid is such a criminal, then he deserves his own thread.

This case, in and of itself, has already lent itself to dozens of pages of commentary (depending on settings, true) - let’s not murky the waters with another case when a perfectly good solution (another thread) exists which keeps communications open and clear for all.

This seems like Junior Modding.
Don’t do this.

This is personalizing arguments. Don’t do this either.

Right now, it’s a bit difficult to disentangle activity of Hunter Biden with respect to the overall discussion surrounding potential impeachment. As such, I’m reluctant to curtail that line of discussion at this time.

[/moderating]

So sorry. I shouldn’t have jumped the gun.

“That’s why it needs to be investigated: it sounds so crazy that no one would suspect it was actually happening that way all along! That’s just how devious these people are!”

Oh no, not at all. Completely cool. :slight_smile: I just wanted to make it clear why I didn’t respond.