We’re going to play a little game, inspired by this thread.
I post the title of an unread classic that I’ve actually read.
The next person who has read that very same obscure classic then posts an obscure classic he or she has read, etc.
For example, I post Middlemarch.
You’ve read Middlemarch. You post “I’ve read Middlemarch, and I’ve read The Pilgrim’s Progress”
Next person posts “I’ve read The Pilgrim’s Progress, and I’ve read A Journal of the Plague Year”
<Psst Thudlow Boink - you’re not supposed to make the game end immediately, you’re supposed to offer something that keep it going, not kill it! Sylvie and Bruno, my ass!>
Yeah, I read it in the original Saxon… not. (I did read at least a little bit, in English. I’m not sure it was a couple decades’ worth of pages, but it might have been. I’ll let somebody else play, and if nobody does, then we can pretend that I read enough of it to count.)
The object is to keep the game moving as long as we can. Not to stop it with something horrifyingly obscure. If you offer something that is horrifyingly obscure, you’re no fun.