The US support for the Shah in 1953 and what happened in Berlin 14 years later

Continuing the discussion from Speculation About Trump's Underlying Reasons for Bombing Iran and Other Targets:

After consulting the mods we have agreed that a new thread is the way to proceed to avoid a hijack. We were talking about the US support for the Shah and what they did to stop Mr. Mossadegh’s coup and how this lead to antiamericanism and the current war in Iran (or not), and whether trump would have one excuse less to attack Iran had things developed differently back then. I have chosen IMHO because it gives more flexibility to wander around; I welcome tangents, loops, and lateral thinking (within reason: please no pet pictures or favourite recipes). Feel free to elaborate. Here we go:

History is complicated and convoluted. Regarding the Shah, and whether he or his regime was better or worse for Iran and the world in general than Mossadegh or not, I would like to make a detour to West Berlin, 1967. The Shah came to visit. It turned out to be a fiasco. They brought with them around 150 Jubelperser. The German wikipedia writes about them:

The term ‘Jubelperser’ [Jubel, like Julibating – Pardel_Lux] (also referred to in the media as ‘Prügelperser’ [Prügel, like bully, someone who beats other people – Pardel_Lux]) was used to describe a group of around 150 Iranian citizens who accompanied Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and his wife Farah Pahlavi on their state visit to West Berlin on 2 June 1967. The group consisted of members of the Iranian secret service SAVAK and compatriots hired by the agency, who posed as pro-Shah demonstrators and, with the tacit approval of the Berlin police, used violence against peaceful counter-demonstrators. The term has entered the German language as a pejorative term for (usually non-violent) claqueurs, i.e. paid applauders.

Translated with DeepL(dot)com (free version)

The demonstrations were attacked by the Jubelperser with sticks and stones, the German police did not intervene and even protected the provocateurs. One policeman, Karl-Heinz Kurras, shot one demonstrator, Benno Ohnesorg. His death was to become one of the most famous and consequencial pictures in post-war Germany:

When I say history is convoluted, I mean, among other things:

More than forty years later, in 2009, it was revealed that at the time of the events Kurras had been an informal collaborator of the East German secret police Stasi and a long-time member of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany, the ruling East German Communist party

Ohnesorg’s death served as a rallying point for the left, and spurred the growth of the left-wing German student movement. The Movement 2 June group, founded around 1971, was named for the day of his death.

Although the 2 June Movement did not share the same ideology as the Red Army Faction (Baader-Meinhof Gang), these organizations were allies.

In 1979 the RAF tried to kill Alexander Haig, by then NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe:

On 25 June 1979, Haig was the target of an assassination attempt in Mons, Belgium. A land mine blew up under the bridge on which Haig’s car was traveling, narrowly missing his car and wounding three of his bodyguards in a following car. Authorities later attributed responsibility for the attack to the Red Army Faction (RAF). In 1993 a German court sentenced Rolf Clemens Wagner, a former RAF member, to life imprisonment for the assassination attempt.

What I am trying to say, among other things, is that the Shah was odious enough to be hated in Iran in 1953 and in West Germany in 1967. His visit radicalized a whole generation of Germans and gave rise to two terrorist organisations. The East German Stasi also played a role. One of those terrorist organisations almost killed the US NATO Supreme Allied Commander in Europe in 1979.

Just imagine the USA had not interfered in Iran’s Mossadegh affair. Maybe the world would be a better place today.

And this detour is just barely scratching the surface. History is weird.

The quoted texts are taken from different wikipedia articles, some in German (translated), some in English. All were linked.

There is a constant temptation to see everything in black and white, those against your ideas are evil monsters without comprehensible motives or redemption, those in favor are may be a bit flawed but in general very upstanding people who’ll never intentionally commit an atrocity…
But the truth is that both are human, and act more or less in what they consider to be their interests, often, if not always, mistakenly.

As you said, history is extremely complicated and convoluted, we can condemn evil acts without reducing their perpetrators to some kind of evil automaton.
And we shouldn’t reduce them so, because it’s counterproductive to truly understanding the situation, and without understanding the situation we can hardly find a solution to it.

Wait, the Shah was in cahoots with the East German secret police? Wasn’t the supposed whole point to supporting him that he’d side with the US against the Communists?

I guess that the ultimate lesson here is that supporting dictators for realpolitik reasons is stupid and counterproductive.

No no, the protester against the Shah that was killed by the west german police and became a martyr was a collaborator of the Stasi, I don’t know if he was there on his own or as an agent provocateur against the Shah.

That’s not the way I read that… Kurras killed the protestor, and Kurras was working with the Stasi.

No, sorry: the protester against the Shah, Benno Ohnesorg, was killed by a West Berlin policeman (not West German, it was complicated. Sonderstatus is the word). This policeman was a member of the East German communist party (unbeknownst to the West Berlin autorities). And an informer for them too. When this was discovered 2009 he was dead and it could not be ascertained whether he acted following orders of the Stasi when he killed Benno Ohnesorg or whether he was just an ICE kind of thug with a loose trigger.
Ohnesorg was a student of Romance and German studies. He was married and his wife was pregnant with their first child. He was the tipical harmless student of humanities in 1967 West Berlin.
ETA: Kurras died in 2014, he was still alive in 2009, but it could not be cleared why he did what he did anyway.

Oh sorry, I completely misunderstood.
So any idea why he killed the protester? was it in his official capacity as a policeman (god knows they often kill protesters) or because of some kind of strategy to destabilize the Shah’s regime?

I think he killed him because he could. And he never paid a price. Except being hated by many people until he died.

Any similarities with modern times ICE behaviour are to be noted and kept in mind.

Ohnesorg was beaten by several police officers; with his hands raised, he was then shot in the back of the head by police officer Karl-Heinz Kurras.

After he had been acquitted of any wrongdoing in shooting Ohnesorg in 1967, the Federal Court of Justice subsequently ruled that the first court had failed to consider all the available evidence and ordered a new trial. Kurras was acquitted a second time.

In 1971 he rejoined the police force and was subsequently promoted to Detective Chief Inspector (German: Kriminaloberkommissar). He retired from the Berlin Police in 1987.

In an interview in 2007, he defended his decision to use lethal force against Ohnesorg, whom he accused of attacking him. He stated, “Anyone who attacks me will be destroyed. Off. Lights out. That is how you must see that.” (German: “Wer mich angreift, wird vernichtet. Aus. Feierabend. So ist das zu sehen.”)

The links I provided are interesting, if I may say so myself.

So that’s literal Bader Meinhof Phenomenon for me :slight_smile:

I had never heard of this incident until a few days ago, when I watched a YouTube video about the Bader Meinhof gang and RAF, which discussed this incident as the thing that incited the whole movement.

I didn’t know the Iranian connection, though I thought it was a Vietnam war protest.

So “official capacity” then.

I have brought a whole bag of sunflower seeds that I plan on eating while reading them.

Because it is not widely known outside Germany I wanted to point it out in the Iran war thread, then thought better of it (hijack!) and opened a new thread. My intention is also to predict that this war will have more negative consequences than the Shah’s visit to West Berlin had.
Kurras killed one student. The RAF killed around 60 people, and was used as an excuse to tighten security laws, suspend habeas corpus in terrorism cases. The Stasi, under the guidance of the KGB (today FSB, if they have not changed their name again) was even more murderous. The current war will be worse, is my prediction.

The connection between the 2 June Movement (the day Ohnesorg was killed) and the RAF is not a straight line, but there is a connection.

Pipas! Saladas? Good thing, I miss the good Spanish ones. You will probably find a lot of parallels with things you know from your country’s history. And Germany was not even a military dictatorship! It is really sad and frightening that so many policemen in so many countries show a tendency to be murderous assholes and get away with it. Pervers.

Thus my reference to ICE. Dangerous stuff ahead, particularly when encouraged from the very top.

Yup:

Yup again.

Or maybe not. It’s easy to imagine worse outcomes.

I didn’t see mentioned in the OP (maybe I missed it) the likely reason(s) why the UK and the US sponsored a coup d’etat against the legitimately-elected Mossadegh government, setting up the Shah as supreme ruler. I don’t suppose anyone who was sitting in any of those UK or US government meetings was allowed to write their memoirs about what went on there, so we are left with the common wisdom, that it was about oil and so-called regional stability (translation: oil). Specifically, the UK oil concerns and their access to that oil, i.e. profits at least as much as strategic concerns.

Iran was a very inviting target for Soviet influence, but I don’t know how vulnerable they would have been, especially if the UK and US governments had been friendly instead of hostile - but that wasn’t going to happen because of the nationalization of UK oil properties.

I also don’t know what the Mossadegh government’s attitude was towards Israel. His National Front party certainly had Islamist influence in it, but it seems to have been much broader than that, having secular, nationalist, liberal and socialist influences as well. Islamist influences tend to be persistent, and it seems to me there is a good chance they would eventually have become dominant over secular and liberal influences, which tend to waffle and collapse especially in poor economic times.

I guess my main point is that there were so many different factors in Iran that it is not possible to say with any level of certainty what would have happened if any particular historical event had gone differently.