Really? I haven’t seen an apology yet where you haven’t been trying to shift blame or make excuses. It’s not your advertisers you’re trying to protect darlin.
Shortcomings? Gray areas? Let me know how that works out when the process servers start knocking at your door. Any of our legal eagles care to weigh in on the “ignorance of the law” defense?
Snerk.
Kkkk…
BWAHAHAHA!!
Quit it! Yer killin me here!
Okay. Now that I’ve stopped laughing enough that I can see to type. While there may be no December issue, I’d recommend at least distributing one final flier. I’m sure the creator/author of Schadenfreude Pie would consent to letting you use his work.
I know the pie was linked earlier, but it was worth repeating.
How do people think they can get away with this stuff. You publish a couple zillion copies of someone else’s work, that means you have a couple of zillion people one of whom might know the source of the thing.
The “Daily Hampshire Gazette” offers another piece of fine journalism which makes La Griggs out to be the victim. The gist is that Cooks Source is now defunct. RIP, plagiarized recipes.
I hate this shit: They claim this whole mess “has fueled a furious debate about intellectual property rights.” What debate? Where is this debate? Nobody has taken Cooks Source’s side in this crap, unless you think the maundering nonsense Griggs occasionally shits out qualifies as debating.
Seriously. We could have a debate over whether it was justifiable to execute the high-ranking Nazi war criminals and it would have more genuine disagreement than any of the commentary I’ve seen regarding Cooks Source.
This kind of lazy ‘balance’ that creates controversy by pretending marginal idiots matter is one of the big reasons I don’t trust traditional news media anymore.
There was no mention of actions by NPR, Disney et al to enforce their intellectual property rights either. I suspect that their actions had more to do with the demise of Cooks Source than anything else.