And I would urge you to read pages 2 and 3 of that thread. Or you could take my word for it, but the rest of the thread has become a case of “But Jodi told him this, and she didn’t get a warning, what are the mods doing” blah blah bliddy blah I’m so stuffy get me a scone.
Same old crap. Hell, I’m a 95% lurker and can see that.
No one thinks that message boards are democracies. What the mods do they do with impunity. But that doesn’t mean people should have to expect and tolerate tyranny.
They’re not. And I know exactly to whom, and to what, you refer, vanilla. I strongly suggest you not go there. Simply accept my word that we’ve handled it.
In my OP, I spend all those words, on the fourth choice of every group listed above trying to paint a picture in words of a certain type of whining jerk. And with one single word you better demonstrate the exact kind of asshole I was trying to describe. A masterpiece of minimalism.
Tyranny. heh.
Can you imagine that there are people who are actually…I can’t think of a strong enough word. Stupid, I suppose. Or self-absorbed. Stupid enough to actually equate a moderating decision on a message board on an internet littered with thousands of message boards, with an “absolute power exercised unjustly or cruelly”. Stalin’s Soviet Union vs The Straight Dope board. Tough choice. :rolleyes:
<snicker>Tyranny. Priceless. Damn. I wish I thought of it.
Fenris, you have been called the master of every art form known to posting, and it has all been true. Another masterpiece!
I see that Sua Sponte has quite ably disposed of the main point to be made here, but the actual answer to the question is that the computer of the Mod. or Admin. who banned putz would thereafter continually crash through the removal of the posthumous blessing of Wally.
No tyranny here. “Tyranny” implies that it’s forced upon people. And I don’t know anybody who can’t just shut down the computer and take a walk instead of posting to the SDMB…
Excluding me, of course. I’m allergic to real life.
Anyone else REALLY amused at the various mental images this conjures? ultress walking to the bathroom with a piece of computer paper, then laughing in a stall, etc.?
You seem to be missing one little possible motive for asking “why was insert poster’s name banned?”
For example: I asked this very question in the Hamburger Helper thread. I did not ask this in order to challenge a mod’s authority, or to challenge the validity of the ban. I asked this in the hope that someone would provide me with a link to a thread where said banned poster did whatever got them banned. I enjoy seeing some troll get torn to bits by other dopers. It’s one of the things that make The Pit such a happy shiny place.
Brothers and sisters! Fellow Citizens! For too long we have been oppressed by King Cecil and his “mods”! Even now, the Comte d’Oncle-bière bitterly oppresses the denizens of Par…err…the pit! The evil Incendefroid tramples us with clogs of steel! While they live in luxury, the people are starving! We are sick! I have a disease that requires me to put exclamation points after every sentence! Rise up with me, and we will overthrow Cecil and have a republic! Long live the revolution! Long live the Straight Dope Message Boards!
Hey, I’m with Zaphod. I check out the “Why was [insert banned poster here] banned?” threads, because they often include links to the last thread posted to by the offending poster. I personally like to watch the banned crash and burn, and be picked apart by the surrounding Dopers. The Mod doing the banning almost always has a great comment, as well. So apart from the fact that they take up space on the board, I have no problem with these threads.
Hilarious OP, by the way. I’m still waiting for the Banned Poster Mad-Libs[sup]TM[/sup] to show up.