The Plain English Campaign (website here) have just announced the recipients of its Golden Bull Awards for examples of mangled English . One “winner” was the Australian Taxations Office, for its Goods and Services legislation
*'For the purpose of making a declaration under this Subdivision, the Commissioner may:
a) treat a particular event that actually happened as not having happened; and
b) treat a particular event that did not actually happen as having happened and, if appropriate, treat the event as:
i) having happened at a particular time; and
ii) having involved particular action by a particular entity; and
c) treat a particular event that actually happened as:
i) having happened at a time different from the time it actually happened; or
ii) having involved particular action by a particular entity (whether or not the event actually involved any action by that entity).’ *
The other awards can been downloaded by the website. There are some wonderful examples , including a 630 word sentence.
Though the 630-word sentence is complicated, how else could they describe the path accurately without using a map? Remember, something like this has to be precise, so how would you improve it?
To be fair, the 630 word sentence looks pretty much like every legal description I’ve ever had the misfortune of typing up. They’re not meant to be pleasing English, only technical descriptions of a property.