The WTC Twin Towers Were **Pulverized** on 9/11

See bottom of post for important links

It’s an Urban Myth that the Twin Towers Collapsed.
The Twin Towers Did Not Collapse,
They Were Pulverized Into Dust.

Look at the following photos:

Where’s the hundreds of tons of steel beams? Each tower was a 1/4 mile tall!

On top of that, where’s the thousands of desks, chairs, bookcases,
computers, xerox machines, water coolers, filing cabinets, doors, sinks, toilets, etc?



On the afternoon of 9/11/01 the “rubble pile” left from WTC1 is essentially non-existent.

WTC7 can be seen in the distance, revealing the photo was taken before 5:20 PM that day.

These documentary excerpts** reveal only one filing cabinet to have been found.
No doors, no phones, no computers, and no doorknobs:

**The material did not break through the subbasements: **
No debris in subbasements:

Source: Star Wars Beam Weapon 1

PATH train was not crushed:

Mall (1st subbasement) not crushed (photos filed 9/19/01):
Original High Resolution:

Original High Resolution:

Empty hole in subbasement under WTC 2 (photo filed 9/18/01):
Original High Resolution:


**The material did not spread out over the surrounding area: **
Mostly unburned paper mixes with the top half of the Twin Towers. As seen a block away, a large portion of the towers remains suspended in air. This dust looks deeper than one inch. Most of the curb looks filled in.

Examine the following three pictures.

Notice any similar characteristics?

**Mount Saint Helens - Erupting Volcano - Massive Energy Release:

Nevada Desert - Nuclear Blast - Massive Energy Release:**

Original High Resolution:

WTC - Massive Energy Release:

The disintegration of the steel core caught on film:

WTC 3: Huge gash. Building material "missing"

WTC 4: Clean vertical cut on the north wing.
Building material on other side of cut “missing”**

Original High Resolution:

Yellow box below locates north wing of WTC 4. As can be seen, the wing was “cut” in line with the north face of WTC 2:


WTC 5 / WTC 6: Round Cylindrical Holes. Building material “missing”.
Mid-section of WTC 6 “missing”**

Original High Resolution:

What Toasted These Cars?

See here for much more:

**Cars along FDR drive were randomly toasted. These cars are at least 1/2 mile away from the WTC.
Note the waviness of the tire tracks. What happened?

Did one car run under the other during the event or were they stacked after the event?
The marks in the pavement suggest they were pushed to the side of the road.

What was this thing across the street? Was it a car? Was it a van?
What caused that line of burn marks on the hood of the car in the foreground on the right?
In the left foreground, the remains of a vehicle sit atop a white sedan.
Are we looking at the front or the back end?
It looks like the front end and if it is, its engine is missing.
We can see daylight through the wheel well.

Why would the front of this fire truck wilt?

The front half of car 2723 is toasted, but check out the new wax job on the back.
Notice the missing front door handle and the untouched back door handle.


Does This Look Like a “Collapse”?**


Dr Judy Wood, former Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University,**
files official Request for Correction (RFC) with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
citing fraud and deception in the 9/11 NIST Report.

Dr Wood is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart.

See her website for her paper co-written with Dr Morgan Reynolds entitled
“Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)”:

They show clear evidence that the World Trade Center was destroyed by a Directed Energy Weapon (DEW).

Dr Judy Wood, former Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University,
files official Request for Correction (RFC) with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) citing fraud and deception in the 9/11 NIST Report.

Dr Wood is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart.

See her website for her paper co-written with Dr Morgan Reynolds entitled
“Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)”:

They show clear evidence that the World Trade Center was destroyed by a Directed Energy Weapon (DEW).

Download Dr Wood’s latest radio interviews, where she walks you through her new paper (still under construction) “Molecular Dissociation: from Dust to Dirt”:

Read through the RFC information in the “news” section and learn that NIST contracted with
Applied Research Associates (ARA) for the 9/11 NIST report.

Not only is ARA a manufacturer of directed-energy weapon technology,
but are also a founding sponsor of Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

DEPS, founded in 1999, put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11.
An excerpt from this newsletter is as follows:

“Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we’re at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of


Judy Wood at Cooper Union, NYC
September 10, 2006

Judy Wood speaking at the forum 9/11 Search for Truth in Seattle
October 28, 2006
For the Best in Uncensored 9/11 Research:

Since you are a newcomer to these boards, I should probably tell you that it’s traditional that all posters end their OP’s with the phrase “Peace Out, Ya’ll!”

Other than that, most of your evidence seems to consist of what’s called anomaly hunting: looking through all the evidence to find this or that thing that you claim is strange or out of place. The problem is that your interpretation of the anomaly is probably flawed.

Reported as Spam.

I wonder what you have to type into the google search box to get these links.

I’m actually sort of interested what the theory is here. As best as I can make out, the OP seems to be implying that the building rubble mysteriously vanished. So in addition to blowing up the other WTC buildings with controlled demolitions, the government also, just because it could, disappeared the rubble? It made the computers, desks, and doors vanish, as if by magic?


The theory, which was brought up in the other thread, is that the towers were destroyed by space-based beam weapons. Even the CT in the other thread doesn’t believe that.

I saw them fall, and I’m pretty sure I would have noticed a space laser. Of course maybe the space laser wouldn’t have shown up on my TV. Hmm…intriguing.

I had a pretty good view of things from the top of my building on John Street at least for the plane crashing effects, though bizarrely, I still only saw them fall on TV since my windows faced the wrong way and I was downstairs trying to figure out what the hell was happening when something further, well, happened.

Ultra-violet, dude. Ultra-violet… :wink:

Don’t you dare talk about the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee like that!

I’m sorry, but Judy Wood is all wet. As Valgard cogently explained in the other thread, “a Star Wars Beam Weapon could not have been responsible. The only alternative explanation is [Marvin the Martian’s] Illudium Q36 Disintegrator, commonly if incorrectly known as a ‘Space Demodulator’. The difference is immediately obvious as the Star Wars stuff makes a ‘ZOINK’ sound whereas the Q36 produces an Earth-shattering Kaboom.”

Toe-may-to, to-mah-to.

The buildings are both obliterated. Whether or not they were minced, diced, cubed, or chewed is irrelevant.

Irrelevant, of course, unless George Bush did it! dramatic music!

My post is not spam. I posted it because there were already debates about 9/11 in here.

I spent a lot of time creating the OP and have posted it to over 20 forums. (google my username for a post with the images.) My reason in doing this is to let people know that the information exists.

The weapon might have been spaced based, but not necessarily.
See here for much more info:

Evidence for Existence of Directed Energy Weapons

Peace Out, Ya’ll!The 9/11 StarWars ExoW CoverUp: Why NASA and NGA was part of the Perp System
(See the main post and the comments)

Directed Energy Weapon Sponsors and Department of Defense Contractors

Well, something here is certainly spaced.

(Heh, he fell for the “Peace out, ya’ll” bit.)

The only problem is that this isn’t really going to end up a debate. Someone will come in and say that you’re picking anomalies to report on. You’ll say that you aren’t and that you have proof. The person will then say that you’re also open to the possibility to a space-based weapon taking out the towers.

All adult-to-adult debate ends there.

Even washing the laser away, where’s the debate? We’ve run through this stuff before.

Do I have to click all those links, or would it be irresponsible to just assume that they’re all nonsense?

damned typos.

I posted this in the other thread, but it’s worth re-stating.
This is Judy Wood. It’s a 35 minute video of unadulterated lunacy. You cannot rely on this woman’s “research” and claim credibility. You just can’t.

Wait. . . I thought you were claiming that a volcano did it . . . or did space aliens erupt Mt. Saint Helens? We all know how much the Greys hate Mt. Saint Helens. Seriously, I’d sooner believe a volcano did it than a directed energy beam. Didn’t you see it happen on tv like the rest of us?

By the way, claiming that your post is not spam by saying you deposited the exact same post at 20 other forums is contradictory.

Your definition of spam must differ greatly from mine.

If you put together all those links yourself, that’s impressive. I figured you just copied and pasted them from some website somewhere.

Can we cut to the chase? I realize it sort of takes the mystery out of it, but what is your theory?

I mean, on the one hand, we’ve got planes crashing into the towers, jet fuel fueled fires, and the towers themselves collapsing - all of it caught on video, from multiple sources, and in front of thousands of witnesses.

What do you think happened? Was it just a coincidence that the hijackers flew the planes into the towers before they were hit with the space rays, or what?