“Some” = 2. And after that fact was pointed out, I supplied two more recent cases to address the deficit formed by dropping the two older ones.
So, now you’ve shifted your argument from, “Ha! Ha! You moron! Suuuuure that happens!” to “Well, well, it does happen, and a good thing too!”
Is that about the size of it?
I don’t suppose you’d care to defend the tactic in any more detail, would you? Is it simply a matter of might makes right? If a crowd of 300 right-wing protestors can scare a crowd of 100 left-wing protestors into silence, that’s OK? Or is the tactic only valid when exercised by protestors with the correct point of view?
You know, it seems to me that you’re making a habit of following me around the SDMB and making snide comments. Please try not to be a snippy little faggot. Although I suspect you and biggirl could get together and make a fine old time out of acting like a couple of silly cunts.
Just for the record, pole, I meant for this to sound like I was talking to myself in a reflective sort of way, as in "Gee, Linty, you know the problem with debating stuff like academic freedom . . . " which everyone with a two- or three-digit IQ seemed to get. I’m sorry if that post came off as ambiguous. I guess I should have added “or both”.
Which means yes, pole, seeing as how we’re pushing for the same thing, I have to admit to myself that you are on my side of the pond, although I think you might have held your breath under water just a little too long.
I’m generally in your camp, and am no doubt one of the least PC posters, but your shot to Miller was uncalled for and makes you look like a jerk. May I suggest that you offer him an apology so this stupidity doesn’t turn into a badge for you? That is all.