Au contraire. The point of my post was to respond to your comment
Her interpretation is just as rational as yours; but you chose to label hers as bratty. Yours is simple apologetics but no more rational than hers. In fact I’d assert that hers is more rational since it implies that God doesn’t really exist, which is consistent with the observed universe and actual historical record, as I pointed out in the first part of my response.
Although Miller’s last two posts make the point much better than I do.