this doesn't make me a pervert, right?

i’m not a huge buffy fan, but i’ve been watching more this past season. recently, i noticed that fx is showing all the buffy episodes in order and they just re-started at the beginning.

i wasn’t really attracted to gellar until i saw these old eps. is it just me, or was buffy a lot hotter back when she was jailbait?

i saw sarah michelle gellar on the mtv whatever awards and she looked calista flockhart skinny. that just aint right. looks like she de-developed since 1996, knawmean?

i just don’t understand it. hollywood must mess a person up.

and willow, damn she looked young. i kinda like her now, though.

I agree, she was much hotter back then. But good news, you aren’t a pervert. She was 19 when the series started (which makes her onscreen romance with Angel a lot less creepy, IHMO, because David Boreanaz (SP?) was in his mid-twenties.)

damn, she’s older than me, or at least the same age.

woohoo, not a pedophile!

The only ‘teenaged’ character on the show who ever played their own age (Or thereabouts) is Michelle Trachtenberg (Dawn), AFAIK.

I know Alyson Hannigan is only a couple months younger than me. (And…well…hot.)

Gellar looked much healthier, much prettier, much cuter, and much hotter when the series started. Now she’s got Hollywood skinny disease.

i think she’s so malnutritioned she’s having delusions.

she’s actually engaged to that freddy prinze jr. hack.

that guy seriously sucks. he’s nyquil on celluloid.

to me she looked ‘fresher’ and had more of a glow.

now she looks hard and angular., which makes her look old.

She also had a different nose.

All I know is that in all those make-up commercials she’s been doing lately, she just looks downright creepy.

Yet, she’s still really hot in Buffy. Funny, that…