This is not a pit, per se, but - was just admonished for NOT taking medical advice?

The BBQ Pit
61

[QUOTE=alice_in_wonderland]
No - I was getting it fine.
[/QUOTE]

All right then, but you didn’t show it when you were arguing against something different from what people were saying. If I was in the thread, I would have thought I wasn’t getting my point across and would have kept trying to get through to you. Maybe I’m being self-centered, but it looks like the people you were arguing against were doing the same thing. If you had said something like “I’m not interested in talking to my doctor about it, it’s not a big deal anyway” I would have dropped it.

62

[QUOTE=alice_in_wonderland]
I find your “concern” misplaced and insincere.
[/QUOTE]

Think what you want-but you don’t usually seem this reactionary. Perhaps you might wanna give up the caffeine along with the aspartame.

63

[QUOTE=Guinastasia]
Perhaps you might wanna give up the caffeine along with the aspartame.
[/QUOTE]

NOW youre giving medical advice.

64

[QUOTE=Doctor Who]

Double use of “fucking”… I give it an 8.5. No, wait… let’s make it a 9.
[/QUOTE]
My, how flattering! I don’t think anyone’s ever scored my pit posts before, let alone so highly. Thank you. :slight_smile:
[QUOTE=Talon Karrde]

If you had said something like “I’m not interested in talking to my doctor about it, it’s not a big deal anyway” I would have dropped it.
[/QUOTE]
(A) Why should she have to say she’s not interested in talking to her doctor about it when she quite clearly said in post #21 that she’d already confirmed it with her doctor?

(B) Why should she have to specifically say she’s not interested in talking to her doctor about random people’s links on a message board when in post #22 she expressed her appreciation for the information, and hoped she wouldn’t offend anyone by choosing to follow her doctor’s advice, particularly since doing so wasn’t going to actually hurt her anyway?

(C) Why should she have to make a showing she was “getting your point?” She specifically asked people, politely to refrain from continuing with that hijack, but she kept getting pounded and pounded. That’s just plain rude.

Then a moderator came along and implied she was an idiot for “disregarding informed opinions” on medical advice she didn’t even want. Ridiculous!

65

[QUOTE=Shayna]
Again, bullshit. Earl Snake-Hips Tucker only asked what was already pretty plain in the OP; whether a doctor had told her about the connection. He then went on to state that he couldn’t find anything to support the contention, but admitted he wasn’t a doctor and left it at that. That post didn’t send the thread off in a direction not intended by the OP – that honor goes to CurtC for being the one to demand a cite. The ridiculous gymnastics you have to contort yourself into to justify the absurd admonition you made when you closed that thread is stunning. And also bullshit, seeing as how, if “no one’s gonna die” because alice didn’t choose to “at least weigh medical cites. . . and take that information to [her] physician,” then there was really no fucking reason to chastise her for daring to be so stupid as to not listen to medical advice she never even fucking asked for.
[/QUOTE]
YMMV.

66

There’s a larger issue here that most people seem to be missing.

I cannot believe that none of the moderators have read this and haven’t issued alice a warning for not providing a link to a cite. We are here to fight ignorance, people! Such a claim simply can’t be allowed to stand without verifiable evidence. To do so goes totally against everything the SDMB stands for! If the mods insist on continuing in this kind of behavior, I may have to seriously rethink my continued participation on these boards.

67

[QUOTE=Guinastasia]
Think what you want-but you don’t usually seem this reactionary. [bolding mine]
[/QUOTE]
An extreme conservative, an opponent of progress? Mother. Fucker. I didn’t realize her real motive until you pointed it out. Goddam conservateurs, they are so fucking subtle and insidious.

68

[QUOTE=Guinastasia]
Think what you want-but you don’t usually seem this reactionary. Perhaps you might wanna give up the caffeine along with the aspartame.
[/QUOTE]

And perhaps you might want to be less patronizing. There may be actual reasons that I’m a little more on edge lately, and if you and I had any sort of relationship, whatsoever, you might know what they were. However, as we don’t, that means that you don’t, which means your “concern” is nothing more than you stirring the pot.

Cut it the fuck out.

And Talon Karrde - what you missed, apparently, was the fact that I acknowledged everyone’s “helpful” information and indicated that I was going to stick with the information I received from my physician instead. Really, had I done anything else, I would be a moron. Or an assfaced baboon without the sense that God gave a rake. I am neither, thankyouverymuch. What I was arguing was that I wanted to talk about drinks without aspartame. Period.

Finally, Wavery, once again, you have cracked my shit up. Will you marry me?

69

WOW! I never imagined this was going to turn into such a hot-button topic. It might end up supplanting the previous record holder “Did WallyM7 really die by being crushed like a can of tomatoes?”

70

[QUOTE=Waverly]
Of course! Because that’s what I do when I find myself disagreeing with a bunch of people on a tangential point that I’m not even interested in… I thank them all, and agree to spend time and money looking into whatever the hell it is they insist I look into.

It’s no imposition, really, and I think my insurance covers “well visits to ask questions the SDMB want me to.” I might even spring for a trip to the emergency room for something that important.
[/QUOTE]

Yeah, far be it from us to actually try to, you know, possibly correct some perceived misinformation being tossed out by a professional. I mean, if her doctor said “Cut down on your sodium intake, it can cause blindness” I am pretty sure that it wouldn’t harm her, either, because we all could probably stand to cut down on our sodium. But holy shit, the two (sodium and blindness) have nothing to do with each other, and the doc is (more obviously in my example) giving out bad advice.

Guess what, doctors aren’t perfect. They are humans just like everyone else, and have long days. Nobody in the thread told her (not even me, in this thread) told her “Holy shit, you should drive to your doctor right this second, pay the copay, and find out WTF is going on with this info!” Nope. Instead, it was suggested that the doc may have made a mistake and misspoken. I think it would be pretty easy for me to call the doctor’s office and say “You know, the doc told me to avoid drinks with some artificial sweetener in them, did he say Aspartame/nutrasweet, or did he say Sweet’n’low/sacharin…I can’t seem to remember”

I’d get a (no charge) call back with whatever the doc had said originally, and then I might have left it alone.

Alternately, she could have said “Thanks for the info, until I get the opportunity to check into it further, let’s continue to discuss where I can find soft drinks w/o aspartame, as per my doctor’s advice.” In other words, a modicum of politeness for well-meaning people who are attempting to answer questions she asked or implied in the OP.

71

[QUOTE=Tuckerfan]
There’s a larger issue here that most people seem to be missing.I cannot believe that none of the moderators have read this and haven’t issued alice a warning for not providing a link to a cite. We are here to fight ignorance, people! Such a claim simply can’t be allowed to stand without verifiable evidence. To do so goes totally against everything the SDMB stands for! If the mods insist on continuing in this kind of behavior, I may have to seriously rethink my continued participation on these boards.
[/QUOTE]

Ah, I predicted this around my post #27 “Here is where some Dirty Old Man usually posts “cite?”.” Shame on you for taking so long. :stuck_out_tongue: :wink:

72

[QUOTE=alice_in_wonderland]
Yes, I’m a troll with 7,200 posts. I guess I’m not a very good one.
[/quote]

You’re not very bright, are you? A troll who managed 7200 posts would be a very good one indeed.

Anyway, I asked because I find it highly doubtful that after 7200 posts you didn’t know your behavior was against the rules. The fact that you’re pathetically desperate for a little attention probably influenced me as well. I do like to help out the mentally challenged, so here you go, some more lovely attention for you:

Ooh, tell us some more how you tell strangers to fuck off. It gets us really hot & horny. Come on, brag about what a total asshole you are some more. It’s so awesome how powerful and self-confident you are, and how superior your freedom from petty concerns about any human being but yourself makes you. I’m amazed they don’t tear down the Lincoln Monument and put up a statue of you instead! Please, please, enlighten us further, Great One! Tell us how not to be spineless little worms by following your stellar example of snooty, adolescent righteousness!

73

[QUOTE=Ensign Edison]
You’re not very bright, are you? A troll who managed 7200 posts would be a very good one indeed.

Anyway, I asked because I find it highly doubtful that after 7200 posts you didn’t know your behavior was against the rules. The fact that you’re pathetically desperate for a little attention probably influenced me as well. I do like to help out the mentally challenged, so here you go, some more lovely attention for you:

Ooh, tell us some more how you tell strangers to fuck off. It gets us really hot & horny. Come on, brag about what a total asshole you are some more. It’s so awesome how powerful and self-confident you are, and how superior your freedom from petty concerns about any human being but yourself makes you. I’m amazed they don’t tear down the Lincoln Monument and put up a statue of you instead! Please, please, enlighten us further, Great One! Tell us how not to be spineless little worms by following your stellar example of snooty, adolescent righteousness!
[/QUOTE]

Wow - am I the only one that thinks this post isn’t actually about me or my thread?

74

[QUOTE=alice_in_wonderland]
Wow - am I the only one that thinks this post isn’t actually about me or my thread?
[/QUOTE]

Us doormats and dumbasses who believe in civilized society need more of your advice, O Bitch Queen!

75

[QUOTE=Ensign Edison]
Us doormats and dumbasses who believe in civilized society need more of your advice, O Bitch Queen!
[/QUOTE]

You are making such an ass of yourself.

76

[QUOTE=alice_in_wonderland]
Finally, Wavery, once again, you have cracked my shit up. Will you marry me?
[/QUOTE]
As it so happens, I am an ordained Universal Unitarian minister. Who would you like me to marry you to? Did things work out with oyster-man?

I must admit I’m jealous, because I was hoping to have a torrid affair with you before you tied the knot. Ah, c’est la vie.

77

[QUOTE=crazyjoe]
Alternately, she could have said …
[/QUOTE]
All the things that Dead Badger quoted?

78

[QUOTE=lisacurl]
You are making such an ass of yourself.
[/QUOTE]

Oh, had we not met before? That’s my specialty. Actually, since I made an ass of myself a long time ago, now I’m just honing my assitude.

Out of curiosity, if you dislike jackasses, what are you doing on the Dope?

79

[QUOTE=Waverly]
As it so happens, I am an ordained Universal Unitarian minister. Who would you like me to marry you to? Did things work out with oyster-man?

I must admit I’m jealous, because I was hoping to have a torrid affair with you before you tied the knot. Ah, c’est la vie.
[/QUOTE]

Uh, that’s not quite what I meant…

80

[QUOTE=crazyjoe]

Alternately, she could have said “Thanks for the info, until I get the opportunity to check into it further, let’s continue to discuss where I can find soft drinks w/o aspartame, as per my doctor’s advice.” In other words, a modicum of politeness for well-meaning people who are attempting to answer questions she asked or implied in the OP.
[/QUOTE]
What, you mean like this?

That’s not polite enough to the “well-meaning” hijackers of her thread? Especially considering said hijackers weren’t “attempting to answer questions she asked or implied in the OP”? She didn’t ask it. Period. And she didn’t imply it. Someone else did. Then everyone got pissy that she wasn’t taking their unsolicited advice and a moderator spanked her for it in the process of closing her thread.

It is not your place or anyone else’s to chastise someone for failing to word their polite refusal of your unsolicited advice in the precise manner you claim you would’ve accepted it.