In the wake of Veterans Day, I will take the small risk of prodding a bit at the philosophical foundations of the idea that freedom can only be preserved by those who give up their own.
Please, let’s not turn this into the series of unrelated anecdotes typical of military-related threads, or the historical mudball fight typical of discussions about politics or geopolitics.
What I hope we can examine is the abstract principle that freedom isn’t free. Enough people have died for it that we really owe it to them as well as to ourselves. Some potential difficulties:
-
What is the price of freedom? Jefferson said it is eternal vigilance. What did that mean to people of his era? What might it mean to ours?
-
Is it necessary, on some level, that freedom be defended by people who don’t practice it at all? For example, autocrats or tyrants? The military seems to need them on a basic level. What might be the implications for society at large?
-
Has economic freedom taken on the same “unfree” characteristic? Is this fallacious or not?
-
When we say freedom isn’t free, what kind of freedom are we usually talking about? Is it a time to question the idea, or is that, in itself, a kind of dishonor to those who have sacrificed?