I suppose. The tox tests on the dead guys and any poking the cops do into the drug habits of the homeowner will tell most of the tale. The rest is just salacious details that don’t affect the outcome. And as you suggest, probably stupid drug-addled details.
One thing about dead people: they are in no hurry. Whether found 4 hours or 40 hours later, it’s all the same to them. And even more so in freezing conditions. They coulda probably laid out there until the end of Feb with no material deterioration.
Not if they were all partaking of the same “shit” as it is known. Toxicology or drug tests will probably bear this out. Whatever killed them, they were all enjoying it.
This site is owned by a need organization and respects copyrights. We expect posters to respect copyrights, too.
From the terms of service:
Copyrighted material. Please observe the following rules regarding copyrighted material.
Fair use posting of copyrighted material only. You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or by the operator of the SDMB, except as permitted by the “fair use” provisions of U.S. copyright law (in general this means brief excerpts only). If you are quoting published material it is good etiquette to provide a link to the source.
File-sharing software. Posts on how to use peer-to-peer file sharing software, virtual private networks (VPNs) and similar technology to evade copyright law are prohibited. Do not ask questions such as “How do I get this peer-to-peer sharing software to work?” or “Can someone help me find a copy of [song or movie clip] using peer-to-peer sharing software?” Debates on the legality of peer-to-peer file sharing are permitted.
You’ve posted a lot more than what’s generally considered “fair use”.
And advising posters on how to evade the terms of use that the owner appears to want (getting around a pop-up without dealing with it) is a violation of the spirit of that rule.
You may post a link, a brief quote, or a summary in your own words, with attribution.
Yep. I used to live in an apartment with bad airflow, so one room was always colder than the other, so in winter, I’d set up fans in the hallway to direct the warmer air to where I wanted it.
It does have a certain … implausibility. Similar in a way to the poolboy at the Polansky/Tate residence in 1969, who claimed to have heard nothing whilst 4 or 5 people were stabbed, shot, tortured, sliced and diced just yards away. “I had my headlphones on”. Sure.
Of course there’s the University of Idaho killings too. 4 people messily stabbed by an intruder and somehow one or two of the other people at home heard or understood nothing. 2022 University of Idaho killings - Wikipedia.
In that case, he didn’t hear anything because there was nothing to hear. There was no screaming. First the residents thought they were being robbed, and chose to stay calm and cooperative. By the time it became clear this was not a robbery, they were not in a position to do any screaming. Grisly != noisy.
“Porch” covers anything from a 20’x20’ room with a solid roof and solid walls and glass windows but no heat to a stair landing 3’ x 4’ with an 12" lip sticking out of the house’s wall over the top door jamb to reduce rain beating directly on the door below.
The pix I saw of the front of the house looked 1960s / 1970s modest. Their “porch” could be anything, but if forced to be sight unseen I’m leaning towards minimal rather than maximal.
I don’t think so - there might be technical differences between a porch , a patio , a deck and a sunroom but the only real difference I’ve ever seen in usage is that decks are always made of wood.
The coroner knew in 12minutes if those guys were on fentanyl or some other substance.
They can make their case against a perpetrator later and tell that.“Yeah, the were stoned/drunk outta their gourds” Or whether a weapon was used or not.