Redwing asks: Did the box contain the head(s) of the victim(s)?
NO
Was Albert a Native of the South Seas?
NO
Were the other four Natives of the South Seas?
NO
Was Albert killed out of disgust for the contents of the box?
NOT DIRECTLY, NO
SingleDad asks: Was there any other reason after seeing him, other than the mere presence of a living Albert, that motivated Charlie and the others to kill him?
YES
Random asks: That’s Kuru. But The Bricker saith that no brains were eaten in the making of this riddle.
Actually, I said something slightly more specific. But to clarify: YES, you are ocrrect that no brains are eaten anywhere in this puzzle.
Mojo asks: Did they (all except Albert) not realize that they were practicing cannibalism at the time?
(watch out for double negatives)! AT THE TIME HUMAN FLESH WAS EATEN, ALL INVOLVED KNEW WHAT THEY WERE EATING
Flypsyde asks: Was there a photo in the box?
NO
aschrott asks: was Albert supposed to have eaten the cut of meat that he did?
YES
was Albert in violation of an agreement made during the cruise?
YES!!!
did something that happened on the cruise separate Albert from the other four (in terms of allegiance)?
In a manner of speaking, YES
were the contents of the package surprising to the other four men?
NO
I remember a similar riddle with albatross soup involved. I really don’t know how it went, though.
I’m guessing that at some point the guys that killed Albert tasted something that let them know that they ate unprocessed Soylent Green, so to speak. yes/no?
Was Albert missing a limb or two when Charlie saw him?
Redwing asks: Were the identities of the victim(s) known to the 4 killers?
MORE SPECIFIC. WHAT VICTIMS?
Flypsyde asks: Was Albert’s cut [of meat taken from] above the waist?
YES
Mojo asks: Was there a shipwreck involved?
YES!
SwimmingRiddles asks: When Charlie saw Albert, was Albert alone?
YES
Grither asks: Were the contents of the box spoiled?
NO
Were the contents of the box recognizable as what they were?
YES
Were the contents of the box recognizable as to whom they comprised?
NO.
IF I AM DISGUISED AS BILL CLINTON, AND I WALK THROUGH THE MALL, AM I “RECOGNIZEABLE”?
If they had neither seen the contents of the box nor had Charlie seen Albert on the street, would they wanted to have killed him?
If the had seen the contents of the box, but had not met Albert on the street, would they have wanted to kill him?
If they had not seen the contents of the box, but still met Albert, would they have have wanted to kill him?
Did C-E take into account in their motivation any events other than the activities during the cruise, the contents of the box and what Charlie saw when he met Albert?
Did they go on the cruise to intentionally practice cannibalism?
You mentioned that the victim of cannibalism was neither a native nor another passenger on the cruise.
Was the victim a member of the crew? Was the victim one of the five men?
Was the victim Albert?
Did the victim die before they ate him (or parts of him)?
Just to confirm, A-E are human beings, and they ate all or part of a human being, correct?
Redwing asks: Were the identities of the victim(s) known to the 4 killers?
MORE SPECIFIC. WHAT VICTIM(S)?
waterj2 asks: I remember a similar riddle with albatross soup involved. I really don’t know how it went, though. I’m guessing that at some point the guys that killed Albert tasted something that let them know that they ate unprocessed Soylent Green, so to speak. yes/no?
YES. BUT I ALREADY SAID THEY KNEW IT WHEN THEY WERE FIRST EATING IT.
Was Albert missing a limb or two when Charlie saw him?
NO!!!
SwimmingRiddles asks: Was Albert supposed to not return home after the cruise?
NO. ALBERT WAS SUPPOSED TO RETURN HOME AFTER THE CRUISE.
Flypsyde asks: Did Albert send the others one of his own body parts to eat?
NO
