tihs is relaly wreid sutff

[ENugent]

This is pretty interesting.

“Relaly” was the first misspelling I saw, but I noticed all of them while I was waiting for the page to load. I think that the shape of “relaly” looks funny to me because I rely on the l’s being together to recognize the shape of the word.

I think that the order I noticed the misspellings was
relaly
wreid
tihs
sutff

Anyone else who saw them all remember an order?

[Moe]

*Originally posted by jacobcoughlan *
**The duitficfly leis wehn the wtrier ocfuestabs.
Eapcelilsy if you dno’t hvae as bgbdionaagirn a vclauraoby as the otnogiriar of the txauetl ertny. **

Ha, I caught another typoed misspelling. I think you meant “big”.

[Svt4Him]

Dyslexics of the world UNTIE!

See, I don’t think it works if you make another word, or if the context is wrong. But it’s still weird.

[jacobcoughlan]

*Originally posted by Moe *
**Ha, I caught another typoed misspelling. I think you meant “big”. **

Wlel, praephs if I was ehnwesicg oouiscfatbn, iteansd of rlvnelieg in lusounoaciqses.

[knock_knock]

Orginially pesotd by Moe
Ha, I caught another typoed misspelling. I think you meant “big”.

OMG! RLAMFOO!!

I wednor waht wlil hpepan wehn +h3 1337 H04r><5 ccath on to tihs ticrk.

l8r dd00$

[Find_Friends]

*Originally posted by Noone Special *
**OK, now this is getting to be eerie!

When reading the quoted post for the first time, I noticed that two words were msleispeld. Fine. then, for some reason I read through the post again. And I only saw the word istnerenitg as being wrong! :eek: Took me about five more scans to find writhwhole again.

Curiouser and curiouser

Dan Abarbanel **

Yes, I was quitong Jpeg Jones for “istnerenitg”. But writhwhole was my own ieda!

---

True Blue Jack

[pencilpusher]

Ok after trying to read the OP 3 times I now have a headache Wanna share that weed now?

[biscuit_hunny89]

[QOUTE] Originally posted by Xerxes

Thanks to the redundancy of language, yxx cxn xundxrstxnd whxt x xm wrxtxng xvxn xf x rxplxcx xll thx vxwxls wxth xn ‘x’ (t gts lttl hrdr f y dn’t vn kn whr th vwls r). [/QOUTE]

and to Svt4Him, I’ve always read Dyslexics of the world UNTIE! as Dyslexics of the world UNITE! if I just smekmid over it.

(btw, smekmid is a new word of mine! no one can steal it! unless you tell me what it really means which I know many of you most likely already CAN… oh well, too bad.) sniff sniff tear

[biscuit_hunny89]

Holy crud-monkeys! I did the little qoute thingy wrong. Dang it. Oh well, too bad.

[biscuit_hunny89]

Oh, wait. I see what the problem is here. I keep spelling quote wrong. To me is always made more sense as qoute rather than quote But that’s just me…

[biscuit_hunny89]

Originally posted by Xerxes

Thanks to the redundancy of language, yxx cxn xundxrstxnd whxt x xm wrxtxng xvxn xf x rxplxcx xll thx vxwxls wxth xn ‘x’ (t gts lttl hrdr f y dn’t vn kn whr th vwls r).

I actually found it easier to read the one without anything to replace the vowels, rather than the one with ‘x’ replacing all of the vowels…

[wendyrules]

I saw this also in another forum and I did find it really amazing how the brain can automatically recognise what each word is.

Unfortunately, it really does make me squirm to read text in that format. I guess you could say that I’m a real “stickler” for correct grammar and spelling. I can’t stand seeing mis-spelled words! But for the purpose of this exercise I sat and read it all!